Ever since Fidel Castro’s forces overthrew Fulgencio Batista’s regime in 1959, Cuba has served as a revolutionary paradigm for Latin American leftists — and the US’ Achilles’ heel in the region. While the regime’s oft-predicted demise has failed to materialize, that might change now that US President Donald Trump has seized control of Venezuela’s fossil-fuel industry, enabling his administration to establish an effective oil blockade of Cuba.
Although Trump recently eased restrictions on private oil sales to Cuba, his pressure campaign has plunged the country into crisis, resulting in dire humanitarian conditions and significantly increasing the risk of uncontrolled migration by boat to the US and Mexico.
Florida, the closest US state to Cuba, could probably handle an exodus on a scale larger than that of the 1980 Mariel boatlift, when around 125,000 Cubans reached Miami after Castro briefly lifted the ban on emigration. However, this might cause a political uproar, especially given Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda. Mexico’s Yucatan peninsula, another major destination for Cuban migrants, lacks the resources to receive and care for those fleeing the nation, as has become evident in recent years.
To alleviate Cubans’ suffering and prevent a new migrant crisis, urgent and innovative measures are required. Instead of threatening a “friendly takeover,” the US government should position itself as a potential trade partner. This would require lifting the trade embargo, which former US president Barack Obama tried to do, though partisan divisions doomed the effort.
The timing is right for such an approach. With a mandatory joint review of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) scheduled for later this year, its members should consider inviting Cuba to join. Tourism is the nation’s main source of revenue, and more than half of its annual visitors come from these three countries. Moreover, Cuban leaders have indicated their eagerness for investment. These factors, coupled with the risk of societal breakdown, might be enough to compel Cuba to launch a transition to a market-based economy with a predictable legal framework.
Such a shift is not unheard of. Consider the EU’s integration of post-communist countries. The prospect of EU membership created huge incentives for internal change. Of course, market liberalization triggered shocks, but most of these countries are far better off for taking the reform medicine, with Poland emerging as one of the EU’s best-performing economies in recent years. Expansion was beneficial not only for the European market but also for regional security.
Compared to Europe, the US shares stronger cultural affinities, including three primary languages (English, Spanish and French) and, despite the wars fought in the 19th century, a common sense of belonging to a new world that had shaken off the shackles of colonialism.
Moreover, the implementation in 1994 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) advanced cohesion and improved lives in all three countries. Trump, who sought to terminate NAFTA in his first term before realizing that doing so would be political suicide, replaced it in 2020 with the USMCA, which tightened the rules of origin for merchandise trade.
As a result, Mexico became the top US trading partner, with Canada close behind, and the three countries are even more integrated today than before Trump first took office, putting them in a stronger position to compete with China. This remains the case despite Trump’s belligerent rhetoric against the US’ neighbors and imposition of high import tariffs in his second term. In fact, Mexico and Canada have fared relatively well following the introduction of tariffs, because USMCA-compliant goods are exempt.
The Trump administration is facing several challenges: Prices remain high ahead of the midterm elections, and the US-Israeli war in Iran threatens to exacerbate the electorate’s affordability concerns. Adding Cuba to the USMCA would create a larger market, improve access to critical minerals, which are being mined in Cuba by Canadian companies, and secure Cuba’s transition to a market economy without resorting to force.
Just as former US president Richard Nixon’s strident anti-communist views gave him political cover to open relations with the People’s Republic of China, Trump’s far-right credentials make him well placed to risk reconciliation with Cuba. As the son of Cuban immigrants and a hardliner, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is also uniquely positioned to achieve this outcome.
However, Trump and Rubio must choose the most effective and least painful route: regional integration. Cubans have endured enough suffering, including the pain of exile and family separation. It might seem improbable, but a new and peaceful Cuban revolution is possible.
Roberta Lajous, a career Mexican diplomat, is a former Mexican ambassador to Cuba (2002-2005) and the author of Historia minima de las relaciones exteriores de Mexico (El Colegio de Mexico, 2012) and La politica exterior del porfiriato (1876-1911) (El Colegio de Mexico, 2010).
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS