Philippine Coast Guard spokesman Jay Tarriela on March 1 was promoted from commodore to rear admiral from Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The promotion is a striking testament to how Beijing’s intimidation tactics on its current main target in the South China Sea have backfired. It is also yet another example that Taiwan can look to when it comes to responding to Chinese scare campaigns.
Tarriela has been consistent in his approach since Manila launched its transparency initiative in early 2023 to counter Chinese “gray zone” tactics around its western waters. As the face of the West Philippine Sea Transparency Office, Tarriela holds news conferences to expose aggressive China Coast Guard encroachments into the Philippines territorial waters to harass humanitarian resupply missions and fishers. He also employs a cost-effective social media approach, publicizing such hostilities in real time.
Tarriela is well aware of the power of global media. He invites local and foreign correspondents on coast guard vessels to witness and film firsthand how China Coast Guard missions use high-power water cannons that often knock crew and personnel off ships and gangster-like activity in which Chinese forces chase, ram and damage Philippine vessels. The largest success in Tarriela’s approach is showing the world the hypocrisy of China’s “Sea of Peace, Friendship and Cooperation” concept in ASEAN.
At an interview with Tarriela in mid-2024, I witnessed the effectiveness of his approach in calling out Chinese aggression. It is a departure from previous diplomatic protests that often went unanswered or were dealt with behind closed doors. With the public well aware and frequently reminded of near daily hostility at their borders, it provides the administration with enhanced legitimacy when responding to China.
It is also the reason Tarriela was able to push back against China summoning the Philippine ambassador in Beijing and the Chinese embassy in Manila’s protest in January in an attempt to silence him along with a number of sitting senators who have been vocal about Chinese maritime aggression.
Tarriela called the embassy’s actions blatant disrespect against Philippine elected officials on their own soil. It is in line with ensuring that their waters remain free for future generations, a response I heard firsthand from Tarriela on why he chooses to be so public and visible in calling out China.
US operations in Iran and Venezuela this year are another promising development that helps boost deterrence. Philippine security expert Renato Cruz de Castro — a former Ministry of Foreign Affairs Taiwan Fellow at National Chengchi University and a distinguished professor in De La Salle University’s Department of International Studies — believes the operations show that the US is capable and willing to use force if its vital interests and the interests of its allies are threatened.
Given that Taiwan and the Philippines are both close US security partners, it would most certainly give Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cause to carefully consider his options. As of Tuesday last week, there have been no Chinese air incursions for three days around Taiwan.
Perhaps constantly ensuring the public is aware of external threats posed through visible campaigns and reminding the aggressor of the consequences of military aggression is a successful formula in managing Chinese threats. What is clear is that Taipei and Manila face common intimidation campaigns coming out of Beijing, and both understand the value of coordinating counter approaches. Tarriela met with President William Lai (賴清德) and other senior officials at a maritime forum last summer in Taipei. It only makes sense that such efforts continue and expand.
Rath Wang is a senior policy fellow at Safe Spaces, a consulting firm based in Taipei and Washington focusing on Taiwan’s politics, media, civil society and key issues influencing Taiwan’s future. He is a producer and host of political talk shows and podcasts and has worked on political campaigns and advocacies in Taiwan, Japan and the US. He can be reached at rathwang@safespacesllc.com.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun