Today, Tibetans around the world mark the anniversary of the 1959 uprising in Lhasa — a day when ordinary men and women rose up against overwhelming force to defend their dignity, culture and faith. Sixty-seven years later, China continues its relentless campaign to dominate not only Tibetan land but also Tibetan consciousness. Yet despite the machinery of surveillance, propaganda and coercion, Beijing has failed to extinguish the Tibetan spirit.
China’s strategy has always gone beyond physical occupation. It seeks to reshape Tibetan identity itself — rewriting history, controlling monasteries, and attempting to sever the bond between Tibetans and the Dalai Lama. Textbooks are censored, language policies erode Tibetan instruction, and religious practice is monitored or restricted. The aim is clear: to engineer loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party by erasing the memory of resistance and the hope of freedom.
However, minds are not so easily colonized. Tibetan resilience rests on three pillars: faith, philosophy and collective memory. For faith and philosophy, Buddhism teaches endurance, compassion and the impermanence of suffering, values that have fortified Tibetans against despair. For collective memory, families pass down stories of the uprising, of exile and of survival. Oral history resists official erasure.
The Tibetan diaspora and allies worldwide amplify voices that Beijing cannot silence. Each March 10, demonstrations remind the world that Tibet’s struggle endures.
Attempts to control thought often backfire. The more Beijing insists on conformity, the more Tibetans cling to their identity. The very act of repression becomes proof of the truth Tibetans carry within them — that their culture and dignity are not gifts from the state, but inheritances from centuries of civilization.
March 10 is not only a day of mourning, but also of defiance. It is a reminder that oppression has limits: It can dictate behavior, but it cannot command belief. Each year, Tibetans reaffirm that their minds remain free, even if their bodies are constrained.
China’s failure after 67 years is a lesson in the futility of trying to dominate the human spirit. Tibetans endure because they know that identity is not granted by power, but preserved through memory, practice and faith. As long as March 10 is remembered, Beijing’s project of control will remain incomplete.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS