Today, Tibetans around the world mark the anniversary of the 1959 uprising in Lhasa — a day when ordinary men and women rose up against overwhelming force to defend their dignity, culture and faith. Sixty-seven years later, China continues its relentless campaign to dominate not only Tibetan land but also Tibetan consciousness. Yet despite the machinery of surveillance, propaganda and coercion, Beijing has failed to extinguish the Tibetan spirit.
China’s strategy has always gone beyond physical occupation. It seeks to reshape Tibetan identity itself — rewriting history, controlling monasteries, and attempting to sever the bond between Tibetans and the Dalai Lama. Textbooks are censored, language policies erode Tibetan instruction, and religious practice is monitored or restricted. The aim is clear: to engineer loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party by erasing the memory of resistance and the hope of freedom.
However, minds are not so easily colonized. Tibetan resilience rests on three pillars: faith, philosophy and collective memory. For faith and philosophy, Buddhism teaches endurance, compassion and the impermanence of suffering, values that have fortified Tibetans against despair. For collective memory, families pass down stories of the uprising, of exile and of survival. Oral history resists official erasure.
The Tibetan diaspora and allies worldwide amplify voices that Beijing cannot silence. Each March 10, demonstrations remind the world that Tibet’s struggle endures.
Attempts to control thought often backfire. The more Beijing insists on conformity, the more Tibetans cling to their identity. The very act of repression becomes proof of the truth Tibetans carry within them — that their culture and dignity are not gifts from the state, but inheritances from centuries of civilization.
March 10 is not only a day of mourning, but also of defiance. It is a reminder that oppression has limits: It can dictate behavior, but it cannot command belief. Each year, Tibetans reaffirm that their minds remain free, even if their bodies are constrained.
China’s failure after 67 years is a lesson in the futility of trying to dominate the human spirit. Tibetans endure because they know that identity is not granted by power, but preserved through memory, practice and faith. As long as March 10 is remembered, Beijing’s project of control will remain incomplete.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS