The scandal surrounding the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein has dominated headlines around the world since the US Department of Justice released millions of files on the case federal prosecutors were preparing when he died in custody in 2019. Nearly a decade after the #MeToo movement, the affair has rightly returned the spotlight to the still under-reported abuse of women by men who feel that their wealth and power allow them to act with impunity. All this underscores the need to strengthen the protection of women’s rights.
However, as policymakers in other countries work to address gender inequality, conditions for women and girls in Taliban-ruled Afghanistan continue to deteriorate, systematically destroying half the population’s hopes and ambitions by prohibiting them from education and employment. Worse still, Taliban officials have been allowed to act with little international condemnation.
Since the group’s return to power in 2021, campaigners have hoped that Muslim-majority countries would be able to pressure or persuade Afghanistan’s Kandahar-based clerical rulers to change their position. After all, Islamic teaching in fact promotes girls’ education and women’s employment. So far, those efforts have also failed.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
The Taliban regime, no longer content with merely excluding girls and women from schools and workplaces, has ramped up its misogyny with efforts to erase women’s visibility from public life. The enactment in January of a new criminal procedure code heralds the loss of basic legal protections and further entrenchment of repression and discrimination against women and girls. It is for those reasons that many observers now talk of the Taliban’s crimes as equivalent to gender apartheid.
The new code fails to criminalize many forms of physical, psychological and sexual violence against women. For example, it treats domestic abuse as a crime only in narrow circumstances, such as when a man leaves wounds, bruising or other visible injuries on his wife. Even then, the maximum punishment appears to be 15-day jail sentence. This reflects the code’s broader shift toward placing a heavy burden of proof on abused women. That is why much of the scant coverage of the new legal framework has described it as “legalizing domestic violence.”
At the same time, Afghanistan’s education ministry has let it be known that girls are to be permanently excluded from secondary education. As the Taliban’s war on women continues to plumb new lows, it is time to recognize, commend, and provide support — financial and otherwise — to the organizations inside Afghanistan that, against the odds, continue to stand up for women’s rights and gender equality.
Thanks to the efforts of some of these groups, thousands of Afghan teenage girls now study in secret, often in underground classrooms. Free classes are offered in a range of subjects, from physics and biology to literature and journalism. Humanitarian aid has been crucial in helping to fund such initiatives.
Consider LEARN Afghan, an innovative non-governmental organization that teaches about 2,500 girls in person in 19 unofficial schools across 18 provinces. Moreover, tens of thousands of Afghan girls have been able to continue their studies through its offline learning platforms and remote education initiatives. What began as a response to the Taliban’s education ban has grown into one of the largest women-led underground education movements in the world.
LEARN’s annual report for last year shows how its courses have helped many Afghan girls gain confidence in their abilities and given them the determination to continue learning, even if it means studying abroad. The organization’s underground schools, sustained by the belief that the right to education is non-negotiable, have allowed young women to dream of professional lives as teachers, doctors, lawyers or whatever they choose.
So impressive is LEARN’s work that Education Cannot Wait (ECW), the global fund dedicated to education in emergencies and for displaced communities, now supports it. While the US has regrettably withdrawn its support from ECW (I am a former chair), the organization’s European funders continue to ensure that as many Afghan girls as possible are supported by LEARN and other unofficial schools, online programs and refugee-education initiatives.
However, continuing to stand up for gender equality in the face of repressive regimes requires resources. To that end, ECW will hold a replenishment conference in November. A new tranche of funding will be indispensable to educating girls in some of the world’s most vulnerable places.
As Pashtana Durrani, founder and executive director of LEARN, put it: “When girls are given the chance to learn, they do more than survive. They lead, they build and they carry their communities forward.”
No country, least of all Afghanistan, can prosper without harnessing the talents of all its people. When girls and women are given the tools they need to realize their potential, everyone benefits.
Gordon Brown, a former prime minister of the UK, is WHO ambassador for Global Health Financing.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime