UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres this month announced the first meeting of the new Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence (AI), a body composed of 40 experts selected from nearly 2,700 global applicants. It marked AI governance’s formal entry into a more institutionalized phase.
Among the panelists is professor Yutaka Matsuo, chair of Japan’s AI Strategy Council, indicative of Japan’s success in securing a crucial level of power in setting the agenda as the international community begins to form rules for global AI governance.
As the question at hand moves from one of technology to the institutionalization of rules and norms, the panel expects to release a report in July that could form the basis of digital trading rules, technological controls and industry standards for the world’s major economies.
Japan, through the participation of one of its key experts in the UN system, has the means to advance its own industry interests in the earliest stages of the norms-setting process. Meanwhile, Taiwan has long had to grapple with constantly being relegated to the status of “rules taker” instead of “rules maker.” This asymmetry naturally becomes a cause for concern for industrial competitiveness.
There are three main implications at hand.
First is that the classification of AI risks might well translate into future technological trade barriers. If major markets come to adopt the UN framework, it would result in a significant cost markup for Taiwan’s development of AI software and system integration services.
Second is the implicit barriers that come with international cooperation on tech; players that cannot meet safety and explainability standards are ultimately excluded from high-level supply chains.
Third, for small to medium-sized enterprises with limited resources, stricter regulations for specific sectors — such as medical AI and surveillance systems — means heightened uncertainty over market access.
While the disparity in rule-making authority does indeed pose a structural problem, if Taiwan could transform its existing strength in semiconductors and computing power into strategic assets for an emerging trustworthy supply chain, it could still leap from the position of capable supplier to that of trusted partner. At this critical juncture in the formation of a global AI governance framework, this would undoubtedly represent a major milestone for smart national policymaking and industrial resilience.
Chiang Tai-chin is director of the Japan Center at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS