UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres this month announced the first meeting of the new Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence (AI), a body composed of 40 experts selected from nearly 2,700 global applicants. It marked AI governance’s formal entry into a more institutionalized phase.
Among the panelists is professor Yutaka Matsuo, chair of Japan’s AI Strategy Council, indicative of Japan’s success in securing a crucial level of power in setting the agenda as the international community begins to form rules for global AI governance.
As the question at hand moves from one of technology to the institutionalization of rules and norms, the panel expects to release a report in July that could form the basis of digital trading rules, technological controls and industry standards for the world’s major economies.
Japan, through the participation of one of its key experts in the UN system, has the means to advance its own industry interests in the earliest stages of the norms-setting process. Meanwhile, Taiwan has long had to grapple with constantly being relegated to the status of “rules taker” instead of “rules maker.” This asymmetry naturally becomes a cause for concern for industrial competitiveness.
There are three main implications at hand.
First is that the classification of AI risks might well translate into future technological trade barriers. If major markets come to adopt the UN framework, it would result in a significant cost markup for Taiwan’s development of AI software and system integration services.
Second is the implicit barriers that come with international cooperation on tech; players that cannot meet safety and explainability standards are ultimately excluded from high-level supply chains.
Third, for small to medium-sized enterprises with limited resources, stricter regulations for specific sectors — such as medical AI and surveillance systems — means heightened uncertainty over market access.
While the disparity in rule-making authority does indeed pose a structural problem, if Taiwan could transform its existing strength in semiconductors and computing power into strategic assets for an emerging trustworthy supply chain, it could still leap from the position of capable supplier to that of trusted partner. At this critical juncture in the formation of a global AI governance framework, this would undoubtedly represent a major milestone for smart national policymaking and industrial resilience.
Chiang Tai-chin is director of the Japan Center at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) said on Monday that it would be announcing its mayoral nominees for New Taipei City, Yilan County and Chiayi City on March 11, after which it would begin talks with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) to field joint opposition candidates. The KMT would likely support Deputy Taipei Mayor Lee Shu-chuan (李四川) as its candidate for New Taipei City. The TPP is fielding its chairman, Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), for New Taipei City mayor, after Huang had officially announced his candidacy in December last year. Speaking in a radio program, Huang was asked whether he would join Lee’s
RSS