Following the US Supreme Court’s ruling that US President Donald Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs are unlawful, and with the Taiwan-US Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) soon to be submitted to the Legislative Yuan for deliberation, the question of whether the ruling would render ART void or require a restart of negotiations looms. Even if the original tariffs are struck down, they would be replaced by a 15 percent across-the-board global tariff levied under Section 122 of the Trade Act. Six months after the initial implementation of the US’ reciprocal tariff policy, uncertainty remains.
While the Section 122 measure would be unilateral and transitional, ART, by contrast, is a stable, institutional arrangement achieved through bilateral negotiations. Notably, the deal has secured tariff exemptions for 2,072 categories of products exported to the US, covering 76 percent of agricultural and industrial goods, which accounts for 42 percent of total agricultural export value and 36 percent of industrial product export value. This brings the average effective tariff on Taiwan’s exports to the US down to 12.33 percent. Being legally based on the provisions of Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act, it is therefore unaffected by the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Looking more closely, 72 agricultural product categories have been granted “safeguard exemptions,” shielding them from additional tariffs imposed under Section 122, while 27 agricultural categories enjoy “exclusive exemptions” of being uniquely exempt from tariff adjustments of any kind. Comparatively, the tariff provisions of ART are more favorable than the previous reciprocal tariff arrangement and the current 15 percent global tariff rate. It therefore serves to safeguard Taiwan, relative competitive advantage and most favorable treatment. The negotiating team’s achievement in successfully sidestepping the legal controversy surrounding the basis of reciprocal tariffs, and ensuring that ART was built on lasting foundations should not go unappreciated.
As for US agricultural imports, Taiwan has firmly held the line on maintaining the status quo for 27 important agricultural products, including rice, while selectively reducing tariffs or opening imports on certain products with low self-sufficiency rates or strong market demand. Taiwan has insisted on upholding international food safety standards and scientific evidence as the basis for regulation — and this represents the best possible negotiated outcome given the long-standing pressure the US has exerted on Taiwan. Without ART, Taiwan would likely continue facing persistent demands to open markets for rice, pork, beef and other products. At the very least, the 27 important agricultural categories would face no further pressure to liberalize in the near term.
These negotiated outcomes were hard-won. Had it not been for the window of opportunity created by Trump’s tariff storm, it is unlikely Taipei would have concluded a Taiwan-US trade agreement within 10 months. The mutual commitment of each side to honor the negotiated results is now a vital foundation for consolidating the bilateral relationship and advancing future cooperation. Moreover, ART can serve as a model for expanding trade agreement negotiations with other countries.
For these reasons, Taiwan should seize this rare and opportune moment, and the Legislative Yuan should pass the bill as swiftly as possible. Thereafter, the legislature must enhance its oversight of the agreement’s implementation and downstream effects, to preserve Taiwan’s competitive edge and its most favorable treatment.
Yang Ming-hsien is a professor in the Department of International Business at Feng Chia University.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the