Transparency International on Tuesday released its Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) scores and rankings for last year. Taiwan’s score increased from 2024 by one point, earning a score of 68 on a scale of zero (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). Its rank also jumped by one spot to 24th globally. This latest score marks a historical high for Taiwan — the nation’s best since CPI evaluations began in 1995. The ruling party is justified in feeling gratified: It can use this professional and objective international assessment to silence the opposition’s criticisms.
However, from a broader international perspective, whether Taiwan could improve on this ranking would depend on a structural breakthrough. Taiwan has long remained outside of the top 20 countries globally, with its score remaining in the 60s for more than a decade. By contrast, Japan ranked 18th with a score of 71, representing fundamental differences in the hierarchy of integrity structures between the two nations. South Korea ranked 30th in 2024 and dropped to 31st last year, its score decreasing from 64 to 63. Although a one-tier gap remains between it and Taiwan, South Korea’s score has been steadily catching up and the country is making rapid progress in improving its integrity.
For Taiwan to undergo a fundamental transformation into a higher level of integrity, the Agency Against Corruption should examine in-depth the constituent sub-indicators of the index so as to identify and address entrenched issues. However, reforms involving social structures and cultural inertia are by no means reversible in the short-term. In recent years, prosecutors, investigators and anti-corruption bodies have worked hard to prosecute allegations of corruption. As such, elected representatives across political parties have been detained and indicted. This phenomenon has given the public the impression that scandals are continuing to surface. Yet it is this enforcement that has won international recognition, demonstrating that legal accountability is being upheld in Taiwan.
I have repeatedly reminded leadership that communication between local leaders, elected representatives and public works bidding must improve to strengthen Taiwan’s integrity, as it is the greatest obstacle preventing Taiwan from surpassing the 70-point mark and advancing into the CPI’s top 20 rankings.
Taiwan’s steadily rising rank in the CPI can be a source of pride for the public. However, if the goal is to make substantial, qualitative advances in its perceived integrity, Taiwan need not initially aspire to the top-tier standards of Nordic countries. Instead, a long-term strategy should begin by drawing on two defining features from Japan — social and cultural pressure and bureaucratic self-discipline. These are precisely the areas in which the government and the public must work together to improve.
Tsao Yao-chun is a researcher with Transparency International Taiwan and an external expert with the Ministry of National Defense on corruption index evaluations of governments.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS