The top Chinese official in charge of Taiwan policy this week said that Beijing must gain dominance in cross-strait relations and firmly support “patriotic pro-reunification forces” in Taiwan.
All Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials must “firmly grasp the initiative and dominance in cross-strait relations” to advance the “great cause of national reunification across the Taiwan Strait,” Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧) said at the Taiwan Work Conference, China’s annual event outling policies on Taiwan.
Wang also reiterated the need to adhere to the “one China principle” and the so-called “1992 consensus,” to support Taiwanese compatriots who firmly support “patriotic reunification” and to “resolutely crack down on Taiwanese independence separatist forces” to deepen cross-strait integrated development.
The so-called “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted making up in 2000, refers to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides of the Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
International analysts have said that China would put off its full invasion of Taiwan until next year — also known as the Davidson window — due to domestic unrest intensified by a sluggish economy, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) massive purges of military commanders and political elites, as well as its geopolitical frictions with countries in the region and the US.
Wang this year took a softer tone regarding Taiwan and rhetorically revisited “peaceful cross-strait development,” which was completely removed from last year’s work conference report.
This adjustment might signal an intent to ease cross-strait tensions, but it is merely a strategic “united front” act, using a “peace” narrative to disguise its desire to “dominate” cross-strait interactions, rather than a fundamental policy shift.
It comes at a critical time ahead of the meeting between Xi and US President Donald Trump in April, as China adjusts its external rhetoric to avoid putting the two superpowers at loggerheads over Taiwan — a situation that might stimulate more US aid and arms sales to Taiwan.
Wang’s rhetoric targeted Taiwan’s nine-in-one local elections in November, and was consistent with Chinese interventions designed to benefit pro-China candidates, who are considered “patriots” promoting cross-strait unification.
China’s ultimate goal of “unifying” Taiwan has never changed, as Wang also said that all cross-strait interactions should follow the “overall strategy of the CCP in the new era to resolve the Taiwan issue,” which regards “national reunification” as an inevitable element of China’s “great rejuvenation.”
The CCP’s support of “pro-unification forces” in Taiwan is also an acknowledgement that China intends to sow division by cultivating “patriots” who promote unification.
It should be noted that right before the conference, the KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wen recently stated that her planned first overseas trip would be China, and if the KMT returns to power, it will promote a "cross-strait peace framework" to advance cross-strait relations.
Wang also has met with a KMT delegation led by KMT Deputy Chairman Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) in Beijing to boost cross-strait cooperation between the CCP and the KMT under the so-called “one-China” framework.
As the opposition party blocks budgets to weaken Taiwan’s defense capabilities, echoing China’s complaints regarding US military aid, the government and the public need to take precautions to avoid further collusion between the CCP and the KMT.
Another lesson that should not be overlooked is the situation in Hong Kong.
While Wang instructed “patriotic reunification forces” in Taiwan to advance cross-strait unification, the Hong Kong authority released a white paper titled Hong Kong: Safeguarding China’s National Security Under the Framework of One Country, Two Systems, emphasizing that Beijing has a “fundamental responsibility” for national security in the territory.
Ironically, the paper was issued just one day after a Hong Kong court sentenced pro-democracy media mogul Jimmy Lai (黎智英) to 20 years imprisonment, the harshest punishment so far under Hong Kong’s National Security Law.
That has further proved that the so-called “one country, two systems” with “ patriots governing Hong Kong” has failed to secure freedom in the territory, instead leading to complete Chinese domination.
For Taiwan, it is crucial to see through China’s united front rhetoric. What could truly determine the nation’s future is not Beijing’s chameleon moves, but how Taiwan consolidates internal consensus and deepens cooperation with democratic partners to safeguard the country’s sustainability.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
When 17,000 troops from the US, the Philippines, Australia, Japan, Canada, France and New Zealand spread across the Philippine archipelago for the Balikatan military exercise, running from tomorrow through May 8, the official language would be about interoperability, readiness and regional peace. However, the strategic subtext is becoming harder to ignore: The exercises are increasingly about the military geography around Taiwan. Balikatan has always carried political weight. This year, however, the exercise looks different in ways that matter not only to Manila and Washington, but also to Taipei. What began in 2023 as a shift toward a more serious deterrence posture
RSS