Former Hong Kong media magnate Jimmy Lai (黎智英), who on Monday was sentenced to 20 years in jail for his role in the 2019 Hong Kong democracy movement and “colluding with foreign forces,” once called on members of the US government for support in his struggle against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Speaking to a forum at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in July 2019, Lai, speaking about the US having the moral authority over the CCP, said: “It’s like they are going to battle without any weapon, and you have the nuclear weapon. You can finish them in a minute.”
It is the last part of that statement, taken out of context to suggest he had asked the US to bomb China, that the Chinese state media propaganda machine has leaned on to promote a narrative of Lai’s treason, and evidence of his inhumanity and of his extreme, debilitating hatred of the CCP. For these reasons, the argument goes, the 20-year sentence for a 78-year-old was justified. The narrative was used to push back against reporting from outside China that the accusations against Lai, the trial process and the sentence itself amounted to political persecution.
It is inconceivable that Lai could have meant the statement literally: He used the term “nuclear weapon” as a metaphor for the overwhelming moral legitimacy that he believed the US had, but that the CCP lacked. He was referring to a conversation that he had just had with then-US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and then US vice president Mike Pence, appealing for support from the US for the democracy protests.
He also referred to then-US president John F. Kennedy’s June 26, 1963, Ich bin ein Berliner speech in West Berlin — in which Kennedy offered encouragement to West Germans in the face of Soviet intimidation and threat — saying that Hong Kongers were in dire need of similar support. Lai also evoked the idea of a cold war as a war of “competing values.”
Asked by the moderator, foundation senior vice president for research Jonathan Schanzer, to clarify what more the US could do in addition to providing moral encouragement, Lai said it could send US senators to Hong Kong to voice their support, to be “physically present” to add weight to the encouragement.
That is what the Beijing propaganda machinery disingenuously interpreted as a call for the use of nuclear weapons against China.
A transcript and video of Lai’s remarks are available on the federation’s Web site. The attempt to vilify Lai as a cold, rabid traitor is so easily refutable, and yet the propaganda machine is betting on the fact that people who want to believe the lie will take it at its word.
Beijing’s attempt to defend the trial as anything but the death of freedom of speech and the smothering of democratic processes in Hong Kong is negated by its very methodology. That the state propaganda machine had to resort to such underhanded methods provides ample justification for the democracy drive in Hong Kong. That politics was given primacy over rule of law has delivered the desired effect: a chilling effect over the media and accountability in Hong Kong.
If the state is prepared to stamp on the face of a wealthy, high-profile public figure, a citizen of another country no less, and to deliver what is essentially a life sentence to a septuagenarian who was simply practicing his right to free speech — which should be guaranteed by international law — then it would be prepared to do this to anyone even with legislation enacted after the alleged “crimes.”
The desired effect was not the ultimate goal. It is just the means for maintaining control over the populace without resorting to state violence, as the world witnessed in the Tiananmen Square Massacre of 1989. The 20-year sentence is less a reflection of the seriousness of the “crimes” than it is a measure of the risk the CCP perceives to its fragile regime.
The ultimate goal was to manufacture the moral legitimacy of a regime that has proven itself capable of visiting violence on its own people, and continues to threaten violence against citizens of another country that it pretends to consider part of its “family.”
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS