Watching news footage of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials shaking hands and exchanging pleasantries with their counterparts across the Taiwan Strait, I could not help but feel a profound sense of temporal displacement. As a member of the generation born after the lifting of martial law and raised under modern civic education, I truly want to ask the KMT: “Do you not see who the true villain is?”
In 1949, the Chinese Communist Party used a bloody civil war to drive the KMT into exile in Taiwan. In the decades that followed, it has sought to completely erase the existence of the Republic of China (ROC) from the international stage. From a constitutional perspective, this was an “independence movement” launched within the ROC that successfully split the national territory. It was Mao Zedong (毛澤東) who changed the national title, replaced the flag and orchestrated “secession” outside the original state system — it was “communist independence” in its purest form. For the KMT, it was the agony of a destroyed home and a lost nation.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which the KMT now regards as a thorn in its side, has won multiple elections, but has not used military force to drive the KMT away, nor has it destroyed the existing system. On the contrary, the DPP continues to use the national title of the ROC, respects the ROC Constitution, and maintains the five-power separation framework originally designed by a founder of the ROC, Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙).
Ironically, one party is a historic enemy who tried to exterminate the KMT; the other is a competitor who inherited its brand and systems.
What the younger generation finds most intolerable is the KMT’s distorted logic regarding friends and foes. In Taiwan’s internal political arena, the KMT fights the DPP tooth and nail, treating them as irreconcilable enemies. However, when facing the very party that seized their land and refuses to renounce the use of force against Taiwan, they appear incredibly submissive, rushing to shake hands and seeking validation.
In the KMT’s logic, “anti-Taiwan independence” seems to have become a fig leaf used to cover up a disregard for past humiliations and the betrayal of the modern democratic system.
A political party that cannot see the context of history is destined to be abandoned by time. When KMT members entertain cross-strait forums, do they not wonder how many young people in Taiwan are disappointed by this posture of “weakness toward the outside, but ruthlessness toward the inside”?
If the KMT continues to treat fellow citizens who defend democratic values as enemies, while treating opponents who destroyed national ideals as allies, then the future of the party might remain buried in the archives of history, never again finding a place in the heart of a modern Taiwan.
Huang Yi-sheng is a student in the Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering at Asia University.
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS