It has become clear what kind of people former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) are.
As the quote often attributed to US essayist Ralph Waldo Emerson says: “The only person you are destined to become is the person you decide to be.”
Potential cooperation between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of the blue camp and the TPP of the white camp over campaigning for November’s local elections has become a top political focal point.
Last month, Ko publicly criticized Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the KMT, saying that the mayor’s free milk for students policy was populist and warning him not to overestimate his own capabilities.
Ko’s criticism sparked dissatisfaction in the blue camp, with several KMT Taipei city councilors accusing him of being caustic and bitter, and being the biggest unknown in the “blue-white alliance.”
There was also division among TPP supporters. A key member of a supporters’ group criticized Ko for his remarks, which hurt the alliance’s unity. The member even advocated that Huang take over all the roles Ko has that paint him as the party’s spiritual leader.
Other TPP backers still favor Ko, arguing that his assessment of the milk policy was accurate and accusing Ko critics of being against the white camp or manipulated by the pan-green camp.
While it seems obvious that Ko’s remarks widened the gap between the blue and white camps, it has also provoked a significant power struggle among TPP supporters.
In 2023, the year that Huang joined the TPP from the New Power Party, he was photographed carrying a balloon depicting Ko on his shoulders, which is a metaphor for Huang’s situation. People online have compared his rise in the TPP to Han Xin (韓信), a Han Dynasty-era Chinese general who endured the humiliation of crawling between the legs of a man who threatened to kill him “to preserve his life and achieve great things.”
Given the morals and psychological state of Huang, Ko could not allow him to continue being a legislator. More political struggles between them can be expected.
The comparison to a power struggle in ancient China works for Ko, too. Presidential Office Secretary-General Chen Chu (陳菊) should be thanked for backing then-Democratic Progressive Party legislator Pasuya Yao as the party’s candidate in the 2018 Taipei mayoral election. Although Ko won, Yao exposed where his allegiances lie and Ko was cut from the pro-Taiwan camp. Attacks from within are the most difficult to handle. Luckily, Ko is no longer the pan-green camp’s problem.
The TPP is actually a small dictatorship. Although Ko is not wise, he is not so ignorant as to not understand Huang’s intentions. The two are simply trying to exploit each other. Ko should have known the miserable fate of choosing Huang as his successor. People know their own kind best.
The relationship between Ko and Huang might look seamless on the surface. Ko was even a guest on Huang’s YouTube show last month, on which Huang pledged loyalty by saying he believes Ko is 100 percent innocent in corruption cases he faces while joking about the TPP’s “two suns.”
However, beneath this surface is a power struggle, with Ko hinting that Huang will be the next to be prosecuted.
The Chinese palace drama will continue, revealing the cruelty and unpredictability of political reality, which is often more astonishing than fiction.
As the saying goes: “Power does not change you; it reveals who you are.”
Li Jung-shian is a professor in National Cheng Kung University’s Institute of Computer and Communication Engineering.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
RSS