It has become clear what kind of people former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) are.
As the quote often attributed to US essayist Ralph Waldo Emerson says: “The only person you are destined to become is the person you decide to be.”
Potential cooperation between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of the blue camp and the TPP of the white camp over campaigning for November’s local elections has become a top political focal point.
Last month, Ko publicly criticized Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the KMT, saying that the mayor’s free milk for students policy was populist and warning him not to overestimate his own capabilities.
Ko’s criticism sparked dissatisfaction in the blue camp, with several KMT Taipei city councilors accusing him of being caustic and bitter, and being the biggest unknown in the “blue-white alliance.”
There was also division among TPP supporters. A key member of a supporters’ group criticized Ko for his remarks, which hurt the alliance’s unity. The member even advocated that Huang take over all the roles Ko has that paint him as the party’s spiritual leader.
Other TPP backers still favor Ko, arguing that his assessment of the milk policy was accurate and accusing Ko critics of being against the white camp or manipulated by the pan-green camp.
While it seems obvious that Ko’s remarks widened the gap between the blue and white camps, it has also provoked a significant power struggle among TPP supporters.
In 2023, the year that Huang joined the TPP from the New Power Party, he was photographed carrying a balloon depicting Ko on his shoulders, which is a metaphor for Huang’s situation. People online have compared his rise in the TPP to Han Xin (韓信), a Han Dynasty-era Chinese general who endured the humiliation of crawling between the legs of a man who threatened to kill him “to preserve his life and achieve great things.”
Given the morals and psychological state of Huang, Ko could not allow him to continue being a legislator. More political struggles between them can be expected.
The comparison to a power struggle in ancient China works for Ko, too. Presidential Office Secretary-General Chen Chu (陳菊) should be thanked for backing then-Democratic Progressive Party legislator Pasuya Yao as the party’s candidate in the 2018 Taipei mayoral election. Although Ko won, Yao exposed where his allegiances lie and Ko was cut from the pro-Taiwan camp. Attacks from within are the most difficult to handle. Luckily, Ko is no longer the pan-green camp’s problem.
The TPP is actually a small dictatorship. Although Ko is not wise, he is not so ignorant as to not understand Huang’s intentions. The two are simply trying to exploit each other. Ko should have known the miserable fate of choosing Huang as his successor. People know their own kind best.
The relationship between Ko and Huang might look seamless on the surface. Ko was even a guest on Huang’s YouTube show last month, on which Huang pledged loyalty by saying he believes Ko is 100 percent innocent in corruption cases he faces while joking about the TPP’s “two suns.”
However, beneath this surface is a power struggle, with Ko hinting that Huang will be the next to be prosecuted.
The Chinese palace drama will continue, revealing the cruelty and unpredictability of political reality, which is often more astonishing than fiction.
As the saying goes: “Power does not change you; it reveals who you are.”
Li Jung-shian is a professor in National Cheng Kung University’s Institute of Computer and Communication Engineering.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement