It has become clear what kind of people former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) are.
As the quote often attributed to US essayist Ralph Waldo Emerson says: “The only person you are destined to become is the person you decide to be.”
Potential cooperation between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of the blue camp and the TPP of the white camp over campaigning for November’s local elections has become a top political focal point.
Last month, Ko publicly criticized Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the KMT, saying that the mayor’s free milk for students policy was populist and warning him not to overestimate his own capabilities.
Ko’s criticism sparked dissatisfaction in the blue camp, with several KMT Taipei city councilors accusing him of being caustic and bitter, and being the biggest unknown in the “blue-white alliance.”
There was also division among TPP supporters. A key member of a supporters’ group criticized Ko for his remarks, which hurt the alliance’s unity. The member even advocated that Huang take over all the roles Ko has that paint him as the party’s spiritual leader.
Other TPP backers still favor Ko, arguing that his assessment of the milk policy was accurate and accusing Ko critics of being against the white camp or manipulated by the pan-green camp.
While it seems obvious that Ko’s remarks widened the gap between the blue and white camps, it has also provoked a significant power struggle among TPP supporters.
In 2023, the year that Huang joined the TPP from the New Power Party, he was photographed carrying a balloon depicting Ko on his shoulders, which is a metaphor for Huang’s situation. People online have compared his rise in the TPP to Han Xin (韓信), a Han Dynasty-era Chinese general who endured the humiliation of crawling between the legs of a man who threatened to kill him “to preserve his life and achieve great things.”
Given the morals and psychological state of Huang, Ko could not allow him to continue being a legislator. More political struggles between them can be expected.
The comparison to a power struggle in ancient China works for Ko, too. Presidential Office Secretary-General Chen Chu (陳菊) should be thanked for backing then-Democratic Progressive Party legislator Pasuya Yao as the party’s candidate in the 2018 Taipei mayoral election. Although Ko won, Yao exposed where his allegiances lie and Ko was cut from the pro-Taiwan camp. Attacks from within are the most difficult to handle. Luckily, Ko is no longer the pan-green camp’s problem.
The TPP is actually a small dictatorship. Although Ko is not wise, he is not so ignorant as to not understand Huang’s intentions. The two are simply trying to exploit each other. Ko should have known the miserable fate of choosing Huang as his successor. People know their own kind best.
The relationship between Ko and Huang might look seamless on the surface. Ko was even a guest on Huang’s YouTube show last month, on which Huang pledged loyalty by saying he believes Ko is 100 percent innocent in corruption cases he faces while joking about the TPP’s “two suns.”
However, beneath this surface is a power struggle, with Ko hinting that Huang will be the next to be prosecuted.
The Chinese palace drama will continue, revealing the cruelty and unpredictability of political reality, which is often more astonishing than fiction.
As the saying goes: “Power does not change you; it reveals who you are.”
Li Jung-shian is a professor in National Cheng Kung University’s Institute of Computer and Communication Engineering.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
RSS