Standing centimeters from Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a military ceremony late last month, China’s highest-ranking general, Zhang Youxia (張又俠), might have had little inkling about the fate that was to befall him just a few weeks later when he was put under investigation.
The 75-year-old’s physical proximity to China’s leader, who stood to his right, reflected the position he held in China’s hierarchy. As vice chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC), the ruling body of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA), he was the second-most powerful person in China’s military, after Xi, the commander-in-chief, but on Saturday, the Chinese Ministry of National Defense announced that Zhang and Liu Zhenli (劉振立), another CMC member, were under investigation for “suspected serious violations of discipline and law,” Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-speak for corruption.
Zhang and Liu have not been formally removed from the CCP or the commission, but being placed under investigation is all but certain to lead to those outcomes.
Illustration: Mountain People
“This is easily the most significant PLA purge in the post-Mao [Zedong (毛澤東)] era,” said Neil Thomas, a fellow on Chinese politics at the Asia Society think tank. “It’s hard to overstate how rare this is ... it would be like arresting the chair of the US joint chiefs of staff for corruption.”
A Sunday editorial in the PLA’s official newspaper laid out the charges against Zhang and Liu. The men allegedly “seriously betrayed the trust and expectations” of the CCP and the CMC, and “fostered political and corruption problems that undermined the party’s absolute leadership over the military.”
Precise details of the allegations have not been revealed, but the editorial suggests that political problems were a factor as well as corruption.
Alfred Wu (吳木鑾), an associate professor at the National University of Singapore, said Zhang’s appearance alongside Xi last month and his nomination to the CMC at the 20th CCP Congress in 2022, when he was past the normal retirement age, indicated that he was a trusted figure until relatively recently.
“Corruption does not just happen overnight,” Wu said.
Zhang is the most senior in a string of top PLA officials who have been defenestrated, including former Chinese minister of national defense Li Shangfu (李尚福), who was kicked off the CMC in 2023 and expelled from the party in 2024. The Wall Street Journal reported that Zhang’s downfall was linked to him having promoted Li.
Dennis Wilder, a senior fellow at Georgetown University and a former senior CIA analyst, said a power struggle was a more likely explanation than corruption.
The purge “isn’t about corruption, it isn’t about leaking secrets, it is about a general that became too powerful,” Wilder said.
Whatever the reason for Zhang’s fall from grace, one thing is certain: Xi wants him gone.
“The fact that Xi is purging his right-hand man in the military is a shocking development, which suggests Zhang was guilty of a significant betrayal of Xi’s trust,” Thomas said.
Zhang was once considered to be one of Xi’s closest military allies. He is a fellow CCP “princeling,” the son of revolutionaries who served under Mao. He is one of the few generals to have seen active combat as a frontline officer during China’s conflict with Vietnam in 1978.
Those credentials, and Xi handpicking him to serve on the CMC, might have suggested a degree of political protection, but Xi seems determined to prove otherwise.
“For Xi, there’s nothing more important than strengthening party discipline and ensuring it does not go the same way as the Soviet Communist party, which in his view was rendered ineffective by corruption,” Thomas said. “No one is safe in Beijing because Xi puts the party above any individual.”
The CCP’s control of the armed forces is central to its, and therefore Xi’s, grip on power. That means that Xi is willing to assert his authority at all costs, even if the result is a somewhat absurd CMC lineup effectively down to two people — Xi himself and CMC anti-corruption chief Zhang Shengmin (張升民).
For Western analysts, the biggest question is what it means for China’s military buildup, and particularly its readiness to launch an assault on Taiwan. US intelligence believes Xi has ordered the military to be ready to win a fight for it by next year, making this a crucial year for modernization. Unification with Taiwan is one of Xi’s main priorities and he has not ruled out the use of force to achieve it.
Some argue that the purges make an attack on Taiwan less likely, at least in the short term, because the army does not have the high-level decisionmaking capacity to launch a sophisticated operation.
“It gives the US military more time to prepare for a Taiwan conflict,” Wilder said.
Others caution that the ousted men could be replaced by a younger, more aggressive lineup of officers who are unlikely to question their leader.
Lyle Goldstein, director of the Asia program at Defense Priorities, a US foreign policy think tank, said that China had unveiled a suite of powerful new weapons at its military parade in September last year, a saber rattling display of bravado.
“I think it would be a major mistake to assume that the Chinese military lacks capable senior officers or that it is less likely to move against Taiwan due to this recent shakeup of the CMC,” Goldstein said.
One aspect widely agreed on is that the investigations would not end with Zhang and Liu.
Academics who study the CCP describe corruption as a feature of the system, not a bug. Zhang and Liu are likely to be interrogated about whatever offenses they are specifically accused of, which would throw up more names.
“More arrests are likely,” Wu said.
Additional research by Lillian Yang
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is