An international organization that refuses to examine its own mistakes while demanding that the world continue to trust it is itself a global security risk. The collapse of trust the WHO is currently facing did not begin with the US’ withdrawal — it is the inevitable outcome of long-standing institutional dysfunction and moral evasion.
The core issue is not whether the US should have withdrawn, but whether the WHO is willing to honestly confront three fundamental problems — allowing politics to override expertise, the absence of accountability mechanisms and a collective amnesia regarding critical errors.
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan alerted the international community to potential epidemic risks. During the pandemic, Taiwan’s performance in border control, the speed of its epidemiological investigations and information transparency was widely regarded by experts in many countries as exemplary. Yet, the WHO continued to exclude Taiwan from its system, even denying it the most basic observer status.
This is not merely a diplomatic dispute, it is a betrayal of public health professionalism. When an international organization — to pander to certain political powers — deliberately disregards a highly capable disease prevention system, the party that suffers is not just Taiwan, but the integrity of the global pandemic prevention network itself.
In the early stages of the pandemic, the WHO relied heavily on statements from China, which lacked independent verification and scrutiny. In the aftermath, it failed to clarify responsibility for delayed reporting and erroneous decisionmaking. As a result, the entire world missed a critical window for virus containment and paid an enormous price in human lives and economic losses. However, the WHO’s response to this was to look forward rather than look inward. Without accountability, institutional growth is impossible.
On the first day of US President Donald Trump’s second term, the US announced its intent to withdraw from the WHO. Although this appeared to be a political shock on the surface, it was actually an institutional warning sign — a major contributor was no longer willing to unconditionally bankroll a dysfunctional organization. The US had long shouldered nearly one-fifth of the WHO’s budget, yet it remained unable to push through even the most basic reforms — a clear indication that the WHO’s governance structure has become excessively rigid.
Many public health advocates worry that the US’ withdrawal would weaken global pandemic coordination. Such concerns are not unfounded, but the real question is not whether the world needs the WHO — it is whether the WHO is worth preserving in its current form. An organization that rejects reform, allows political interference to override expert judgement and evades responsibility cannot safeguard public security — even if it is well-funded.
The real solution is not emotional appeals, but systemic reconstruction — placing professional expertise at the organization’s core, eliminating political interference, incorporating highly capable partners such as Taiwan and establishing clear, accountable mechanisms for decisionmaking and review. Otherwise, it can only be said that the WHO’s crisis is not the result of external forces, but a consequence of its own choices.
A WHO that dares not hold China accountable while continuing to exclude Taiwan has no right to ask that the rest of the world continue funding its dysfunction.
Hsiao Hsi-huei is a freelance writer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
There is a modern roadway stretching from central Hargeisa, the capital of Somaliland in the Horn of Africa, to the partially recognized state’s Egal International Airport. Emblazoned on a gold plaque marking the road’s inauguration in July last year, just below the flags of Somaliland and the Republic of China (ROC), is the road’s official name: “Taiwan Avenue.” The first phase of construction of the upgraded road, with new sidewalks and a modern drainage system to reduce flooding, was 70 percent funded by Taipei, which contributed US$1.85 million. That is a relatively modest sum for the effect on international perception, and
At the end of last year, a diplomatic development with consequences reaching well beyond the regional level emerged. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared Israel’s recognition of Somaliland as a sovereign state, paving the way for political, economic and strategic cooperation with the African nation. The diplomatic breakthrough yields, above all, substantial and tangible benefits for the two countries, enhancing Somaliland’s international posture, with a state prepared to champion its bid for broader legitimacy. With Israel’s support, Somaliland might also benefit from the expertise of Israeli companies in fields such as mineral exploration and water management, as underscored by Israeli Minister of
When former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) first took office in 2016, she set ambitious goals for remaking the energy mix in Taiwan. At the core of this effort was a significant expansion of the percentage of renewable energy generated to keep pace with growing domestic and global demands to reduce emissions. This effort met with broad bipartisan support as all three major parties placed expanding renewable energy at the center of their energy platforms. However, over the past several years partisanship has become a major headwind in realizing a set of energy goals that all three parties profess to want. Tsai
On Sunday, elite free solo climber Alex Honnold — famous worldwide for scaling sheer rock faces without ropes — climbed Taipei 101, once the world’s tallest building and still the most recognizable symbol of Taiwan’s modern identity. Widespread media coverage not only promoted Taiwan, but also saw the Republic of China (ROC) flag fluttering beside the building, breaking through China’s political constraints on Taiwan. That visual impact did not happen by accident. Credit belongs to Taipei 101 chairwoman Janet Chia (賈永婕), who reportedly took the extra step of replacing surrounding flags with the ROC flag ahead of the climb. Just
RSS