Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy secretary-general Lin Pei-hsiang (林沛祥) said that Taiwan’s low birthrate is no longer a warning sign, but a fact of life. The declining birthrate has become a genuine national security crisis. More dire yet is that it is not merely low, but the lowest on Earth.
Why is this the case? Is it not because the KMT promoted an unfair and unjust pension system? Why is it that only military personnel, police and civil servants can receive continuous pay raises while in service and enjoy a preferential interest rate of 18 percent after retirement, while everyone else receives no such benefit? KMT legislators have also encouraged property developers to speculate in the real-estate market, leaving many Taiwanese with no hope of owning a home.
Lin said the Democratic Progressive Party repeatedly points to record highs in the stock market and impressive economic indicators in an attempt to create an atmosphere that Taiwan is doing well. If society truly felt secure and hopeful, why would young people choose not to have children?
A nation’s birthrate reflects the most honest portrait of society.
Why does the KMT continue to focus solely on workplace and retirement benefits for the military, police and civil servants while ignoring the welfare of all other groups? What is the purpose of opposing pension reform? Are they aware that the retirement funds of average workers are far lower than that of military personnel and civil servants?
Lin said that systems such as child development accounts and baby bonds have long existed internationally and are considered important policy tools for addressing intergenerational inequality and restoring confidence to start families. The national security crisis posed by low birthrates transcends party lines — it decides whether Taiwan’s next generation has a future.
If it were not for the massive national defense budget required to face the threat of a hostile neighbor, China — and for the extremely high pensions awarded to military personnel, police and civil servants — the money saved could certainly fulfill Lin’s wishes.
KMT legislators even questioned Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics Minister Chen Shu-tzu (陳淑姿) about why the general budget has not yet been approved and why fighter jets have not yet been upgraded. Is the real issue not that the KMT has continuously blocked both the general budget and the special defense budget?
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS