Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy secretary-general Lin Pei-hsiang (林沛祥) said that Taiwan’s low birthrate is no longer a warning sign, but a fact of life. The declining birthrate has become a genuine national security crisis. More dire yet is that it is not merely low, but the lowest on Earth.
Why is this the case? Is it not because the KMT promoted an unfair and unjust pension system? Why is it that only military personnel, police and civil servants can receive continuous pay raises while in service and enjoy a preferential interest rate of 18 percent after retirement, while everyone else receives no such benefit? KMT legislators have also encouraged property developers to speculate in the real-estate market, leaving many Taiwanese with no hope of owning a home.
Lin said the Democratic Progressive Party repeatedly points to record highs in the stock market and impressive economic indicators in an attempt to create an atmosphere that Taiwan is doing well. If society truly felt secure and hopeful, why would young people choose not to have children?
A nation’s birthrate reflects the most honest portrait of society.
Why does the KMT continue to focus solely on workplace and retirement benefits for the military, police and civil servants while ignoring the welfare of all other groups? What is the purpose of opposing pension reform? Are they aware that the retirement funds of average workers are far lower than that of military personnel and civil servants?
Lin said that systems such as child development accounts and baby bonds have long existed internationally and are considered important policy tools for addressing intergenerational inequality and restoring confidence to start families. The national security crisis posed by low birthrates transcends party lines — it decides whether Taiwan’s next generation has a future.
If it were not for the massive national defense budget required to face the threat of a hostile neighbor, China — and for the extremely high pensions awarded to military personnel, police and civil servants — the money saved could certainly fulfill Lin’s wishes.
KMT legislators even questioned Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics Minister Chen Shu-tzu (陳淑姿) about why the general budget has not yet been approved and why fighter jets have not yet been upgraded. Is the real issue not that the KMT has continuously blocked both the general budget and the special defense budget?
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic