This is the season when columnists turn to prophecy, and then congratulate themselves a year later for getting some of it right. I am afraid I am about to join the club.
As I predicted at the end of 2024, Asia last year revolved around three main forces: the blossoming bromance between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), rising pressure on Taiwan, and a newly emboldened North Korean leader Kim Jong-un drawing closer to Moscow and Beijing.
These dynamics would only get more obvious this year. The region is heading into an increasingly precarious year, with deepening tensions that would have a cascading effect on all of us.
Illustration: Mountain People
On the surface, Trump and Xi appear to have found a new warmth — but it is fragile. Xi was the winner of the trade war last year, which means Trump is going into this year on the back foot. That would not be lost in Washington, no matter how loud the bluster. While the rapprochement has been welcomed by markets, a lot could go wrong. They would have the opportunity to meet as many as four times, providing multiple occasions for relations to head south.
And even if they do not, they would likely remain tense, a Mercator Institute for China Studies forecast for US-China relations said. Almost three-quarters of respondents, comprising China experts and observers, see relations deteriorating across the board, from military and trade ties to technology. That is despite Trump’s decision to allow Nvidia Corp to sell advanced chips to China, watering down years of national security safeguards.
Nvidia’s top products would still be restricted, Washington said, but the move gives Beijing access to semiconductors at least a generation ahead of its best technology.
Tokyo has become more vocal about the link between its own security and stability in the Taiwan Strait, a position Beijing views as provocative. Xi would see how much he can push Trump on Taiwan, the self-governed democratic nation Beijing claims as its own. That would make Taipei more vulnerable.
President William Lai (賴清德) has his work cut out. He would need to navigate a politically gridlocked legislature while trying to pass a US$40 billion supplementary defense budget aimed at modernizing the military and bolstering deterrence to defend against the rising threat from China. Taiwan has already pledged to lift defense spending to 5 percent of GDP by 2030, up from more than 3 percent, but more money alone might not be enough.
US intelligence sources believe that Xi wants the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to be capable of an invasion by next year. However, many military strategists suggested a full-scale invasion then is unlikely, as China’s economy grapples with a slowdown and the PLA reels from corruption probes and purges. They point to quarantine or blockade scenarios instead.
Beijing, which has vowed to take control of Taiwan through peaceful means, but has refused to rule out using force, has ramped up military and political pressure over the past few years to assert its claims. The PLA conducted a second day of live-fire military drills to Taiwan’s north on Tuesday, while China’s “gray zone” tactics — warplanes crossing the median line, naval patrols circling the nation, cyber and information warfare — are now near-daily events. These would almost certainly continue this year.
North Korea is among the most serious risks on Asia’s security landscape. A briefing last year from the US Defense Intelligence Agency said that Pyongyang has now developed an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching the continental US.
Kim has repeatedly rejected denuclearization negotiations since the most recent talks in 2019 with Trump broke down. The North Korean leader views nuclear weapons as a guarantor of his security and has no intention of renouncing them. He is also being emboldened by his deepening ties with Russia and steady support from China, which is changing the calculus on the Korean Peninsula.
South Korean officials have hinted at the chance of a summit with the North this year, something unimaginable more than a year ago. This gives Kim leverage he has been looking for to potentially get sanctions relief, or extract tacit approval from the US that denuclearization has been a failure, and that he can go ahead and continue with his nuclear weapons program. Expect more missile launches, diplomatic theater and other attempts to hijack the geopolitical agenda.
Asia this year is not on the brink of war, but the region would be more volatile than it has been in recent memory. Buckle up.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter, and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS