This is the season when columnists turn to prophecy, and then congratulate themselves a year later for getting some of it right. I am afraid I am about to join the club.
As I predicted at the end of 2024, Asia last year revolved around three main forces: the blossoming bromance between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), rising pressure on Taiwan, and a newly emboldened North Korean leader Kim Jong-un drawing closer to Moscow and Beijing.
These dynamics would only get more obvious this year. The region is heading into an increasingly precarious year, with deepening tensions that would have a cascading effect on all of us.
Illustration: Mountain People
On the surface, Trump and Xi appear to have found a new warmth — but it is fragile. Xi was the winner of the trade war last year, which means Trump is going into this year on the back foot. That would not be lost in Washington, no matter how loud the bluster. While the rapprochement has been welcomed by markets, a lot could go wrong. They would have the opportunity to meet as many as four times, providing multiple occasions for relations to head south.
And even if they do not, they would likely remain tense, a Mercator Institute for China Studies forecast for US-China relations said. Almost three-quarters of respondents, comprising China experts and observers, see relations deteriorating across the board, from military and trade ties to technology. That is despite Trump’s decision to allow Nvidia Corp to sell advanced chips to China, watering down years of national security safeguards.
Nvidia’s top products would still be restricted, Washington said, but the move gives Beijing access to semiconductors at least a generation ahead of its best technology.
Tokyo has become more vocal about the link between its own security and stability in the Taiwan Strait, a position Beijing views as provocative. Xi would see how much he can push Trump on Taiwan, the self-governed democratic nation Beijing claims as its own. That would make Taipei more vulnerable.
President William Lai (賴清德) has his work cut out. He would need to navigate a politically gridlocked legislature while trying to pass a US$40 billion supplementary defense budget aimed at modernizing the military and bolstering deterrence to defend against the rising threat from China. Taiwan has already pledged to lift defense spending to 5 percent of GDP by 2030, up from more than 3 percent, but more money alone might not be enough.
US intelligence sources believe that Xi wants the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to be capable of an invasion by next year. However, many military strategists suggested a full-scale invasion then is unlikely, as China’s economy grapples with a slowdown and the PLA reels from corruption probes and purges. They point to quarantine or blockade scenarios instead.
Beijing, which has vowed to take control of Taiwan through peaceful means, but has refused to rule out using force, has ramped up military and political pressure over the past few years to assert its claims. The PLA conducted a second day of live-fire military drills to Taiwan’s north on Tuesday, while China’s “gray zone” tactics — warplanes crossing the median line, naval patrols circling the nation, cyber and information warfare — are now near-daily events. These would almost certainly continue this year.
North Korea is among the most serious risks on Asia’s security landscape. A briefing last year from the US Defense Intelligence Agency said that Pyongyang has now developed an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching the continental US.
Kim has repeatedly rejected denuclearization negotiations since the most recent talks in 2019 with Trump broke down. The North Korean leader views nuclear weapons as a guarantor of his security and has no intention of renouncing them. He is also being emboldened by his deepening ties with Russia and steady support from China, which is changing the calculus on the Korean Peninsula.
South Korean officials have hinted at the chance of a summit with the North this year, something unimaginable more than a year ago. This gives Kim leverage he has been looking for to potentially get sanctions relief, or extract tacit approval from the US that denuclearization has been a failure, and that he can go ahead and continue with his nuclear weapons program. Expect more missile launches, diplomatic theater and other attempts to hijack the geopolitical agenda.
Asia this year is not on the brink of war, but the region would be more volatile than it has been in recent memory. Buckle up.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter, and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS