Japanese pop singer Ayumi Hamasaki was originally scheduled to hold a concert in Shanghai on Nov. 29, but she received a last-minute notice to cancel the show the day before — despite the fact that it took a team of more than 200 from Japan and China five days to prepare the stage.
Media reports focused on Hamasaki’s professionalism, after she insisted that the show would go on, performing to an empty venue. She expressed her regret on social media at being unable to apologize in person to all her fans who had come from across the world, adding that she was unwilling to comment on affairs that she did not understand.
The incident was caused by the growing tension in Japan-China relations, following Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Japan’s response to a potential Taiwan contingency. China launched a ban on Japanese entertainers late last month.
If a ban was really intended, China could have notified the Japanese side long ago. The delay was due to Takaichi’s refusal to retract her comments, leading Beijing instead to target Japanese civilians. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) seems to feel this is a victory to be proud of. Hamasaki and her team had come from Japan, taking five days to set up the stage, while her fans traveled long distances to Shanghai. They all spent a considerable amount of money for this, with the CCP gloating over their misfortune.
The Shanghai foreign district used to be a shining beacon of architecture and style for China, but this was extinguished when the CCP got its hands on them. With China’s reform and opening up, jazz was heard once again in the Peace Hotel at the Sassoon House, as Shanghai regained some of its past glamor, giving people an illusion of the better days. Now even this mere illusion is about to be extinguished.
Even in the extreme communist era, Shanghai was the best managed city in China, thanks to the foundation laid by the past foreign concessions, but the city has devolved into a politically-oriented sprawling CCP concession.
Shanghai CCP Party Secretary Chen Jining (陳吉寧) is a Chinese academic with multiple degrees. After graduating from China’s Tsinghua University, he earned a doctorate from Imperial College London. During his study in the UK, Chen was fully aware of the tragedy of the Tiananmen Square Massacre in 1989.
However, after returning to China, Chen has had to bow before Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), whose doctorate from Tsinghua University might be questionable. This time, Chen has caused a global sensation by banning the Japanese pop diva. Why?
The CCP often dons its best Western attire to conceal its unmannered nature, but when it comes to confrontations with other countries, it switches to its Mao suit to intimidate. Chinese diplomats are not even trying to conceal their nature when meeting with their Japanese counterparts, even as Chinese officials rushed to Dalian to placate Japanese enterprises, assuring them it was still safe to conduct business in China. Xi is clearly at his wit’s end.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS