One of the tightest elections in Dutch history produced an outcome so close that first steps in negotiating a new coalition government have yet to begin. However, as the forward march of the far right across Europe dominates headlines, sapping the confidence of mainstream parties, an uplifting takeaway was immediately clear: A less divisive kind of politics can still cut through with the public, if it is prosecuted with conviction and panache.
The big and unexpected winner of last week’s poll was 38-year-old Rob Jetten, the charismatic leader of the centrist liberal party Democrats 66 (D66), which almost tripled its vote and is set to top the polls by a whisker.
Basing his campaign on the former US president Barack Obama-style slogan “Yes we can,” Jetten presented himself as an optimistic unifier to an electorate exhausted by the polarizing politics of Geert Wilders, whose anti-immigrant Party for Freedom (PVV) dominated the outgoing coalition.
Jetten has a very good chance of being the country’s youngest-ever prime minister.
Rumors of the death of Europe’s political center might have been exaggerated after all, but the celebrations should not be overdone.
Understandably euphoric, Jetten told his supporters after the election: “We have turned the page on Wilders.” For the time being that is true.
Wilders’ mainstream coalition partners have no intention of teaming up with him again, following his decision to collapse the last government when it failed to enact his extreme anti-immigration plans.
However, the PVV’s slump in the polls still left it virtually tied with D66 in first place, and Dutch politics remains stuck on the same page in relation to the far right overall.
Most of Wilders’ lost votes went to smaller rival parties with similar agendas. As the political scientist Cas Mudde has pointed out, their collective presence in the next parliament would be slightly bigger than before.
By contrast, the center-left had a miserable night, culminating in the resignation of GreenLeft/Labour Alliance leader and former European commissioner Frans Timmermans.
That political backdrop means that a future center-led coalition, perhaps presided over by Jetten, would bear a heavy responsibility.
The D66 campaign argued that chaotic politics of division were inadequate to the task of solving a huge housing crisis, prohibitive healthcare costs and concerns over immigration. Its message landed because of the shambolic performance of Wilders’ party in power.
However, a failure to deliver radical change from the center could unleash a still darker backlash.
For now, Jetten’s sudden emergence as a political star offers progressive movements much-needed reasons to be cheerful. Handed real influence after the PVV’s comfortable election victory two years ago, Wilders comprehensively blew it. The politics of optimism and collaboration are back in fashion in the Netherlands, and a pro-European, pro-climate-action leader might be in charge of the country next year.
In countries such as France, Germany and the UK, where the center has just about held up to now, the dynamics are not quite the same. Nevertheless, as mainstream parties allow far-right themes to frame the political agenda, the rise of D66 is a case study in how to do things differently. Jetten should be congratulated for demonstrating that, given a chance, “hope not hate” politics can work.
The government and local industries breathed a sigh of relief after Shin Kong Life Insurance Co last week said it would relinquish surface rights for two plots in Taipei’s Beitou District (北投) to Nvidia Corp. The US chip-design giant’s plan to expand its local presence will be crucial for Taiwan to safeguard its core role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem and to advance the nation’s AI development. The land in dispute is owned by the Taipei City Government, which in 2021 sold the rights to develop and use the two plots of land, codenamed T17 and T18, to the
US President Donald Trump has announced his eagerness to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong-un while in South Korea for the APEC summit. That implies a possible revival of US-North Korea talks, frozen since 2019. While some would dismiss such a move as appeasement, renewed US engagement with North Korea could benefit Taiwan’s security interests. The long-standing stalemate between Washington and Pyongyang has allowed Beijing to entrench its dominance in the region, creating a myth that only China can “manage” Kim’s rogue nation. That dynamic has allowed Beijing to present itself as an indispensable power broker: extracting concessions from Washington, Seoul
Taiwan’s labor force participation rate among people aged 65 or older was only 9.9 percent for 2023 — far lower than in other advanced countries, Ministry of Labor data showed. The rate is 38.3 percent in South Korea, 25.7 percent in Japan and 31.5 percent in Singapore. On the surface, it might look good that more older adults in Taiwan can retire, but in reality, it reflects policies that make it difficult for elderly people to participate in the labor market. Most workplaces lack age-friendly environments, and few offer retraining programs or flexible job arrangements for employees older than 55. As
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
RSS