President William Lai (賴清德) last week attended a dinner in Taipei with representatives from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). During the event, he expressed “relief” about the release of Israeli hostages and said that Taiwan had “provided assistance to the Israeli people through humanitarian aid and medical supplies.”
While such remarks might reflect Taiwan’s concern for humanitarian issues, they highlight a glaring omission: the ongoing catastrophe in Gaza. Palestinian civilians, particularly women and children, have been under relentless bombardment and severe obstruction of humanitarian relief. This silence exposes a troubling double standard in Taiwan’s human rights discourse — one that threatens to undermine its international credibility.
Over the past two years, Gaza has faced one of the most devastating humanitarian crises in modern history.
UN data showed that more than 37,000 Palestinians have been killed and nearly 2 million have been displaced. Amnesty International and several governments have condemned Israel for serious contraventions of international humanitarian law. South Africa has gone a step further, filing a case with the International Court of Justice, accusing Israel of genocide.
Taiwan’s government has remained silent, continuing to deepen diplomatic and economic ties with Israel. This raises an uncomfortable question: Can Taiwan still claim to uphold universal human rights while turning a blind eye to suffering in Gaza?
Amnesty International said that Israel’s actions in Gaza are crimes against humanity, including the deliberate killing of civilians, forced displacement, collective punishment and the obstruction of humanitarian aid.
The organization urged governments to support the International Criminal Court in investigating and holding Israel accountable. Refusing to do so would only perpetuate Israel’s sense of impunity and weaken the global human rights framework.
If the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Presidential Office continue to highlight the “good news” of hostage releases while ignoring the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, this reveals not only a moral blind spot, but also a strategic misjudgment. Taiwan’s strength in global diplomacy lies in its moral standing — its ability to present itself as a democracy committed to universal values. If it applies those values selectively, it risks losing the moral high ground that has long distinguished it from authoritarian regimes.
At a time when the international community is calling for a ceasefire and increased humanitarian access, Taiwan’s one-sided sympathy for Israel risks portraying it as inconsistent on human rights. Such a stance could alienate potential allies in the Global South and civil society organizations that have historically supported Taiwan’s democratic aspirations.
Taiwan has much to gain by adopting a principled, balanced position — one that acknowledges the security concerns of all parties while reaffirming the universal rights of people. Calling for an immediate ceasefire, urging respect for international humanitarian law and offering aid to Palestinians in Gaza would not only demonstrate moral courage, but also improve Taiwan’s reputation as a responsible and compassionate democracy.
Taiwan’s history gives it a unique moral perspective. Having struggled for decades to secure democracy and human rights, Taiwan understands the value of global solidarity. Just as Taiwan hopes the world would stand with it in times of crisis, it, too, should stand with others when their fundamental rights are under assault.
Human rights cannot be selective, nor should moral conviction be silenced by diplomatic convenience. If Taiwan truly aspires to be a nation founded on human rights values, it must have the courage to speak out for justice — even when doing so is politically inconvenient.
Silence in the face of suffering is not neutrality; it is complicity. Taiwan must choose to be on the side of humanity. Only by doing so could it earn the respect, trust and solidarity of the international community it so rightly seeks.
Chiu E-ling is the executive director of Amnesty International Taiwan. Echo Lin is the chair of Amnesty International Taiwan.
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
The ongoing Middle East crisis has reinforced an uncomfortable truth for Taiwan: In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, distant wars rarely remain distant. What began as a regional confrontation between the US, Israel and Iran has evolved into a strategic shock wave reverberating far beyond the Persian Gulf. For Taiwan, the consequences are immediate, material and deeply unsettling. From Taipei’s perspective, the conflict has exposed two vulnerabilities — Taiwan’s dependence on imported energy and the risks created when Washington’s military attention is diverted. Together, they offer a preview of the pressures Taiwan might increasingly face in an era of overlapping geopolitical
There is a peculiar kind of political theater unfolding in East Asia — one that would be laughable if its consequences were not so dangerous. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on April 12 returned from Beijing, where she met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and spoke earnestly about preserving “peace” and maintaining the “status quo.” It is a position that sounds responsible, even prudent. It is also a fiction. Taiwan is, by any honest definition, an independent country. It governs itself, defends itself, elects its leaders, and functions as a free and sovereign democracy. Independence is not a
RSS