The nation’s first case of African swine fever (ASF) is not only a major crisis for the pork industry, but has also put the Taichung City Government under the spotlight, revealing sloppiness and incompetence in handling the crisis.
The central government on Oct. 22 confirmed Taiwan’s first case of ASF at a pig farm in Taichung, and implemented measures, including temporary bans on transporting and slaughtering pigs, and using food waste as feed (the most likely source of the virus) to feed pigs, to prevent ASF from spreading and destroying the domestic pork industry.
The Taichung Agriculture Bureau initially said it has “done whatever has to be done,” but over the following days, the city government changed its story several times, and further investigations and tests have found more issues of concern.
The inconsistency in its stories — such as saying that a contracted veterinarian went to the farm on Oct. 14 when pigs suddenly died and then changing the story every day for five consecutive days, uncertainty about the vet’s and vet aide’s roles, and questions regarding why the pigs were not tested after the first report — has begun to erode the public’s trust in the city government’s grasp of the situation, let alone its ability to effectively control it.
Other discoveries have raised further concerns about the city government’s attitude and incompetence, including discrepancies in the number of dead pigs and reported abnormal deaths, which has led to a criminal investigation into alleged document forgery; failure to get the farm to upload data regarding food waste processed into feed, which is mandatory; the farm still testing positive for ASF despite all pigs being killed and the city government saying it had disinfected the site several times, so the military had to step in to thoroughly disinfect it on Friday; and disposing the city’s food waste in an open-air landfill (wild boars could reach the waste and eat it).
After the series of mistakes were discovered, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) Taichung City Council caucus on Friday filed a petition to the Control Yuan asking it to investigate Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) and her officials for “nonfeasance or misfeasance in office.”
Politicians and members of the public questioned if government budget cuts and freezes — such as the 60 percent cut in the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency’s (APHIA) promotional fees — by opposition lawmakers this year could have diminished public awareness of not bringing pork into Taiwan, which is widely believed to be the source of the ASF.
It is mind-boggling that while Lu and the handling of the crisis is being investigated, and central government agencies are stepping in to help, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus is trying to shift all the blame onto the central government.
KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) claimed the outbreak happened because President William Lai (賴清德), who was premier in 2018, had not imposed a nationwide ban on using food waste as pig feed, and that the failure in border control was due to Lai being “too invested” in the mass recall against KMT lawmakers.
Customs checks at the airport have been tightened since the outbreak to prevent travelers bringing pork into the country, but KMT Legislator Chen Hsueh-sheng (陳雪生) criticized the government, saying it was “stricter than the [Chinese] Communist Party” and inconveniencing people.
KMT lawmakers in 2023 also proposed to freeze a large portion of the APHIA’s budget, because “customs check penalties were too heavy,” which luckily did not pass.
Although the KMT and the Taichung City Government have repeatedly called on the central and local governments to work together to address the ASF crisis, their actions do not match their words, as they seem to be manipulating the narrative to blame the DPP-led government and even hinder its efforts.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more