Sat, Nov 01, 2025 page8

• Retrocession Day, KMT hypocrisy

  • By Lee Min-yung 李敏勇
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  On Saturday last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) emphasized the significance of Retrocession Day, which it recently restored as a national holiday. It was not alone. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) also marked the “Commemoration Day of Taiwan’s Restoration,” framing itself as Taiwan’s successor state.

  The KMT views Taiwan as having been restored to the Republic of China (ROC) on Oct. 25, 1945, when the ROC accepted Japan’s surrender at Taipei’s Zhongshan Hall, then known as the Taihoku Public Hall.

  During the ceremony, the surrender of General Rikichi Ando, the last Japanese governor-general of Taiwan, was formally accepted by ROC representative Chen Yi (陳儀) on behalf of the Allies — several other representatives of whom were present. Japan’s surrender is also celebrated on the Korean Peninsula, with the North and South marking Liberation Day on Aug. 15, when the Empire of Japan formally surrendered there after World War II.

  While Aug. 15 marks the end of WWII, it is not formally celebrated in Taiwan. The much-disputed Oct. 25 date should simply be seen as the anniversary of the beginning of ROC rule — and the latest instance of Taiwan falling under the authority of an alien force.

  It was the official handover of Taiwan to be governed by the ROC as a representative of the Allied forces following an interim “government-less” period. Having entered the modern era and thrown off the yoke of Japanese colonialism, Taiwanese came to be ruled by the ROC, which perceived itself as heir to the “motherland.” Taiwan became a province of what they believed to be Asia’s first democratic republic and for a time, that was celebrated.

  The question is, what meaning does “motherland” hold for Taiwanese today and for how many has the initial welcoming soured into resentment?

  After less than a year and a half of ROC rule, the 228 Incident erupted in 1947. On March 19, 1949, martial law was declared and on Oct. 1, the ROC was expelled from China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). After that, Taiwan was under 38 years of quasi-colonial control by the exiled KMT.

  In 1971, the ROC, led by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), lost its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan fell short of retaining recognition as a country, leaving a state of uncertainty that has persisted even after democratization.

  Taiwan’s democracy in the 21st century, achieved through a quiet revolution, encompasses several political parties, including the KMT, but the KMT’s fall from absolute power has not led it to prioritize democratic development or national security.

  In the post-Chiang era, the KMT has turned a blind eye to its own history of conflict with the CCP — never mind the PRC’s ambitions of doing away with the ROC and swallowing Taiwan whole — leaving the nation to contend with the consequences of the KMT and the CCP continually uniting against it.

  Oct. 25 as Retrocession Day is meant to spotlight a Chinese restoration of Taiwan. In reality, it marks nothing more than the start of the ROC’s rule — much the same as June 17, 1895, marks the beginning of Japanese rule. The Qing Dynasty ceded Taiwan to Japan after its defeat in the First Sino-Japanese War, but after World War II, Taiwan emerged neither liberated nor independent. Instead, Japan’s defeat and the end of one colonial occupation came in the form of a handover to the ROC. To frame that as “retrocession” is a perverse distortion of history.

  The ROC’s KMT and the PRC’s CCP stake claims linked to Retrocession Day — even though the PRC was yet to be established in 1945. The later-exiled ROC colonialists at the time would never have acknowledged the PRC’s distortions of today.

  Conceptualizations of retrocession and liberation are subjective. If Taiwan is to have a day commemorating liberation after the end of World War II, it should, like South Korea and North Korea, be independence day on Aug. 15.

  Retrocession Day should be rejected by Taiwanese.

  As for the KMT, its transformation from opposing the CCP in the Chinese Civil War and the post-war period to growing increasingly closer to it today is a major contradiction.

  Lee Min-yung is a poet.

  Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Taiwan in Time: The breakfast that sparked Taiwan’s semiconductor revolution

  • 2

    Criticism to motivate Yamal: Barca assistant

  • 3

    Xi, Trump differ on outcome of talks

  • 4

    Takaichi vows ‘golden age’ of ties with the US

  • 5

    Trump says he would bring up Taiwan in Xi talk