Malaria is a pandemic disease that hits the voiceless hardest: Most of those who fall ill and die are small children and pregnant women in Africa. It is the leading infectious killer on the continent, responsible for nearly 600,000 deaths a year. Cases are rising and there is an urgent need for more funding, yet Western donor countries are instead cutting back on aid. We still hear brave talk about eliminating malaria, but an expert report now warns of a potential resurgence that could add almost 1 million more deaths to the annual toll by the end of the decade.
Most of the money to fight the mosquito-borne disease — 59 percent — comes through the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Its executive director, Peter Sands, last week said at the World Health Summit in Berlin that of the three killers, the one that kept him awake at night was malaria.
This could be the canary in the coal mine. Malaria kills far more quickly than HIV or tuberculosis. The impact of funding cuts and aid diversions, and the scrapping of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) by US President Donald Trump, which housed so much global health expertise, would be seen in the malaria figures faster than in most other diseases, but our despoliation of the environment is also in play.
The climate crisis is altering rainfall patterns and enabling the spread of mosquitoes. The parasites they carry have developed some resistance in east Africa to the artemisinins, the best drugs we have against the disease. It happened with chloroquine and with every other malaria drug, and undermines the effectiveness of artemisinin-impregnated bed nets as well. There was a window of real opportunity while the drugs had full power, but it is closing.
The other hope is vaccines, and some have been developed and rolled out, but although they offer about 50 percent protection against death from malaria in the first year — for a child fortunate enough to get vaccinated — they do not stop transmission.
Cases surged in 2023, the latest for which we have figures, reaching 263 million, which was 11 million higher than in the previous year. The report, from a group of agencies — including Malaria No More UK and the African Leaders Malaria Alliance — supports the call of the Global Fund for more money.
Data analysis shows the damage that would be done if malaria control slips — and the hugely positive impact on African lives and economies if pressure on the parasite can be maintained. Reaching a 2030 annual funding target would save 1.86 million lives and boost African GDP by US$231 billion, as healthy children stay in school and become economically productive rather than a cost to society.
In contrast, a 20 percent cut would lead to 82,000 more deaths and a drop in GDP of US$5.14 billion. A severe cut in funding would mean 990,000 more deaths as malaria prevention collapses, and a GDP drop of US$83 billion.
Worryingly, the second scenario is already on the cards: Germany has promised 1 billion euros (US$1.16 billion) to the Global Fund, which is a 23 percent cut on previous contributions. Malaria is a really hard disease to beat, but it can be done and it would surely be unthinkable to let the killing climb again. The UK, rumored to be considering a 20 percent cut, and other countries, must find the funds however tight their budgets, to save voiceless children’s lives.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
RSS