China’s strange and inconsistent behavior on the international stage often stems from the externalization of internal issues. As the fourth plenary session of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 20th congress approached and tensions built, Beijing suddenly tore up the trade framework it had agreed upon with the US in London in June, announcing strict controls on rare earths exports — a move that was clearly driven by domestic political struggles.
Such unruly behavior led US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent to publicly criticize Chinese Trade Representative Li Chenggang (李成鋼) for being “unhinged.” Almost immediately after Bessent’s comment, Beijing hastily punished Li — stripping him of his post as permanent representative to the WTO — as a show to Washington. Soon after, China and the US began two days of preliminary trade negotiations in Malaysia. Following the talks, Bessent announced that China had agreed to postpone its rare earths export controls by one year. In reality, this was another case of crying wolf — similar to when China boycotted US soybeans in 2018, only to resume purchases later.
To fool its own people, China often puts on a show, only to quickly back down and submit. This has become a routine that even Chinese citizens have come to frequently mock. However, Taiwan’s pro-unification media continues to echo the CCP’s rhetoric each time, boasting that China has “overpowered” the US.
Taiwan is a democratic nation. While the media’s misinterpretation of the US-China trade war might still fall within the bounds of free speech, echoing China’s intent to invade Taiwan with military force crosses into the realm of national security issues.
Incoming Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) once claimed that Chinese military aircraft were “defending” Taiwan during their incursions. At that time, no other foreign military forces were anywhere near Taiwan — only Taiwanese and Chinese aircraft were confronting each other. If Cheng truly believes that Chinese military aircraft were defending Taiwan, does that mean she regards Taiwan’s own military forces as the enemy? Does she consider the Republic of China to be unlawfully occupying Taiwan? Despite the scrutiny her controversial remarks have received, Cheng continues to insist that she said nothing wrong.
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) in an interview at the Legislative Yuan said that daily “gray zone” harassment and expanding military threats from Chinese aircraft are indisputable facts. However, he did not comment on Cheng’s remarks so as to maintain administrative neutrality. Anyone who treats a foreign adversary as a friend and their own army as the enemy is precisely the kind of individual that the Ministry of National Defense must guard against. Koo must issue a stern statement on this matter — he cannot afford complacency.
The foreign ministries of normal countries around the world always strive for peace, using diplomatic means up until the point of declaring war, while defense ministries emphasize that they are willing and able to fight. However, during former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration, the reverse often occurred — the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued firm statements, while the Ministry of National Defense paradoxically promoted peace.
President William Lai (賴清德) appointed Koo, who served as National Security Council secretary-general under Tsai, as minister of national defense to facilitate continuity in national governance — a selfless act on behalf of the nation. However, Koo should be reminded to correct previous bad habits. When faced with the opposition’s overbearing behavior and threats to national security, a defense minister must respond with firm condemnation.
Issues of national defense and foreign affairs fall under the president’s authority. Thus, the defense minister must fully implement the president’s directives and put in the utmost effort to defend Taiwan — whether that means building up the military or correcting misinformation in the media and in the legislature. It is no longer acceptable to hide behind “administrative neutrality.”
Tommy Lin is chairman of the Formosa Republican Association and director of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS