Beyond headlines of carbon markets and energy transitions, climate action fundamentally pertains to the Earth we inhabit. Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 calls for swift climate change action. SDG 15 — Life on Land — calls for nations to protect, restore and maintain the sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems. In Taiwan and India, the two goals go hand in hand. From fragile mountain forests to semi-arid rangelands, the success or failure of climate policy is measured not just in tonnes of carbon, but in the health of the soil, rivers and biodiversity.
Taiwan’s geography illustrates this vividly with high-elevation forests and unique species. The Central Mountain Range reaches more than 3,000m. Rising temperatures, more powerful typhoons and unpredictable rainfalls already create landslides and erode conservation areas. Coastline wetlands are critical to migratory birds and serve as natural protection from floods. These areas are threatened by sea level rise and development pressures. Without specific counteractions — improved forest management, slope stabilization and habitat corridors — climate action might hasten the loss of ecosystems altogether.
India’s landscape is equally instructive, but far larger. The Himalayas store water for hundreds of millions, but these reserves are retreating under rising temperatures. Semi-arid grasslands are turning into dust bowls. Mangroves in the Sundarbans buffer storm surges, but they are eroding.
India has made ambitious commitments on renewable energy. Yet its funding for ecosystem protection remains thin. Programs like reforestation and watershed restoration are fragmented. Climate considerations are not always integrated into biodiversity policy.
This is where Taiwan-India cooperation can play a role. Taiwanese universities and research institutes have developed elaborate climate models of mountain slopes and water catchments at the local level. India has practiced large-scale, community-consensus-based ecosystem restoration — from joint forest management to rural watersheds — involving thousands of villages. Combining their respective strengths would render SDG 13 more effective and SDG 15 more reachable.
A pilot project could pair Taiwanese remote-sensing and early-warning systems with Indian expertise in community stewardship to monitor and restore highland forests in Taiwan and grasslands in India. Joint research on climate-resilient native species could inform reforestation in both countries. Data-sharing agreements could help track birds whose migrations bridge South Asia and East Asia, creating a rare link between conservationists separated by politics, but united by ecosystems. Such partnerships would also help both countries avoid the “green paradox” of climate policy undermining biodiversity. Large renewable energy installations can threaten habitats if poorly planned. Hydropower dams might be low-carbon, but they have a high impact on river ecology. By integrating SDG 13 and SDG 15 from the start, Taiwan and India could develop planning tools that weigh carbon benefits against ecosystem costs, showing other countries how to pursue climate goals without sacrificing nature.
Diplomatic limitations need not hinder this agenda. Taiwan’s exclusion from the UN climate and biodiversity conventions restricts visibility, but not potential. India, meanwhile, is positioning itself as an advocate of the global south. Building on the SDG Asia Expo already held in Taipei, a “climate and nature” forum could be launched through partner organizations or as a side event timed with COP30 in Belem, Brazil, allowing both to show leadership without waiting for an invitation.
The economic argument is as solid as the environmental one. Clean forests and wetlands retain carbon, help regulate water flow, and minimize impact from disasters — advantages that outweigh expenses.
Ten years from now, when the globe is reviewing the post-2030 agenda, the question will not just be if emissions were reduced, but if the living systems that support us were preserved.
Taiwan and India, though vastly different in size and situation, have mutually supporting assets that can answer that question. If their actions are aligned with SDG 13 and SDG 15, they can demonstrate that climate action and life on land are not competing objectives, but mutually supportive pillars of a resilient future.
By doing so, they would also present an example to other democracies that find themselves within a divided international order: Even in the absence of formal accords, functional science-based cooperation has the ability to safeguard both the climate and the biodiversity upon which it depends.
Sutandra Singha is an independent researcher with a doctorate in international studies from Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi, specializing in climate change.
Lockheed Martin on Tuesday responded to concerns over delayed shipments of F-16V Block 70 jets, saying it had added extra shifts on its production lines to accelerate progress. The Ministry of National Defense on Monday said that delivery of all 66 F-16V Block 70 jets — originally expected by the end of next year — would be pushed back due to production line relocations and global supply chain disruptions. Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that Taiwan and the US are working to resolve the delays, adding that 50 of the aircraft are in production, with 10 scheduled for flight
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
RSS