Amid election interference by China, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday last week was elected as the party’s new chairwoman. After her victory, Cheng expressed her commitment to achieving complete governance, cross-strait peace and shared prosperity by 2028.
Compared with Eric Chu (朱立倫), who is chairman until the end of this month, Cheng — who loudly proclaims herself Chinese — is even more pro-China. If, under her leadership, the KMT continues to firmly uphold the so-called “1992 consensus” and the “one China” principle, does Taiwan risk being further trapped within the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China” framework and ultimately swallowed by China — or, as the CCP calls it, “reunification”?
In the past few years, China has expanded its military presence in the South China and East China seas. To maintain the balance of power in the western Pacific, the US has bolstered its alliance with Japan and extended the scope of its defense to include Taiwan, incorporating the nation into its Indo-Pacific strategic framework to counter China. Amid an international environment defined by the US-China strategic competition, if the KMT were to return to power and promote the “1992 consensus” — a policy that so strongly favors Beijing — how could it possibly win the trust and assistance of the US? Without US military support, how could the Republic of China (ROC) defend itself?
After taking office on Nov. 1, could Cheng’s pro-peace, pro-China slogan really deter a Chinese invasion and guarantee cross-strait peace and shared prosperity? Has she forgotten the bitter lesson the KMT learned after World War II, when it extended an olive branch to the CCP that only served to accelerate China’s downfall?
Located along the first island chain, Taiwan holds a position central to the US’ Indo-Pacific strategy. It is a critical gateway for China’s entrance into the East and South China seas and the expansion of its maritime power. If China were to seize Taiwan’s critical, geopolitically strategic position, its power would significantly increase, posing a direct threat to US hegemony.
Taiwan controls two major maritime routes linking Northeast Asia to the South China Sea — both vital energy supply lines and major shipping routes to Europe and Africa. They are also lifelines for Japan’s maritime trade.
Additionally, Taiwan’s world-leading high-tech industry supplies about 90 percent of the advanced, high-quality and affordable semiconductors used by the US and other nations. China knows that without Taiwan, democratic nations would struggle to function.
Peace is dependent upon strength. In the past few years, Taiwan has increased its national defense budget, purchased new weapons, extended compulsory military service to one year and expanded its armed forces to more than 260,000 personnel. Coupled with the powerful deterrent force posed by the coalition of the US, the EU, Australia, Japan and the Philippines in the Indo-Pacific region, these measures have discouraged the CCP from recklessly invading Taiwan.
However, if the KMT returns to power, it would likely scale back on defense and distance Taiwan from democratic alliances, providing the CCP with an opening to seize Taiwan, exploit its strategic location and semiconductor supply chain, and directly challenge the US — and Taiwanese would be dragged into the confrontation.
Taiwanese are all in the same boat. After taking office, does Cheng plan to lean heavily toward China — seeking peace with Beijing, distancing Taiwan from the US and drastically cutting the national defense budget?
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat formerly posted in the US.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences