After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman-elect Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) victory in the party’s leadership race, the KMT’s intent to bring in external forces to counter its domestic political rivals became all the more apparent.
There is no shortage of such stories in history. At the end of the Ming Dynasty, militant Wu Sangui (吳三桂) — in seeking revenge for the loss of his concubine after rebels captured Beijing — opened the Shanghai Pass to allow the Qing army to enter. While the Qing forces indeed defeated peasant rebel leader Li Zicheng (李自成), they ultimately destroyed the Ming Dynasty. Wu later rebelled himself, only to be crushed by the Qing army.
At the end of the Tang Dynasty, warlord Zhu Quanzhong (朱全忠) relied on the Shatuo Turks (沙陀突厥) to suppress the remnants of the peasant rebellion led by black-market salt dealer Huang Chao (黃巢), but the two later turned against one another, plunging the realm into chaos.
Every historical instance of borrowing power has resulted in a century of humiliation. Those who seek to kill with a borrowed knife inevitably suffer the backlash. History has demonstrated countless times that external forces never offer help for free. Rather, they provide a fleeting reward before seizing the entire country.
Taiwan’s pro-China faction has forgotten history and discarded its lessons, driven by its own illusions. What is referred to as the “pro-China camp” has shifted from a political stance to a weak sense of sovereignty. When a political party relies on a foreign hostile power, it no longer represents voters — it is merely an agent of the enemy.
What was once a self-run business has become a franchise, degenerating into a branch directly managed by the other side of the Taiwan Strait. In politics, this is a betrayal of loyalty.
From Wu to Cheng, the problem has never been in China’s strength, but instead in that some in Taiwan seek to invite foreign powers to destroy their domestic political rivals.
Yet history has already written the ending — those who rely on external forces would eventually be devoured by them.
Chang Shang-yang is a farmer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS