In the aftermath of the Mataian River (馬太鞍溪) barrier lake collapse in Hualien County, there were gaps and failures in the distribution of supplies, while delays led to boxed meals meant for victims and volunteers spoiling behind red tape. The problem stemmed from administrative inefficiency and flaws in the system’s design.
Commenting on the issue on a political talk show on Sept. 30, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei City Councilor Chung Pei-chun (鍾沛君) said: “Did any of them starve from not getting a boxed meal? No.”
Chung’s comment brings to mind the emperor from the Book of Jin (晉書), who asked: “Why don’t they eat meat gruel?” when told his subjects were suffering because of a famine. Its European analogue, “let them eat cake” from pre-revolutionary France, is, in the same way, symbolic of the ignorance of the powerful. These quotes are not remembered for causing the famines in question, but for exposing the severe disconnect between those in power and ordinary people.
Flood survivors in Hualien were not asking for cake, but a basic hot meal. To say that “no one died” and showing a total lack of remorse betray a chilling indifference.
After the flood, some people went for days with only steamed buns to eat, while volunteers worked into the night without a hot meal. This was not because no one cared, but because provisions had been held up by the local government. Even more people missed out when some local officials demanded that people show their ID to get a hot meal.
The central government provided supplies and resources, but the local government was busy stocktaking rather than distributing provisions to the front lines. When procedures take precedence over human lives, institutional rigidity becomes a secondary disaster.
The KMT has come to Chung’s defense. Instead of looking at the local government’s shortcomings, some KMT members have placed the blame squarely on the central government, saying that the problem lay with evacuation procedures going awry.
Amid this confusion, what the public sees is evasion rather than accountability. Even emperors would have faced condemnation from intellectuals and the public for this kind of sophistry. Yet, in today’s democratic age, where leaders no longer hold absolute power, there are still those who defend preposterous comments like this. Those defending Chung are not interested in serving and protecting the victims, but in holding on to power.
The danger in dismissing victims’ sufferings through throwaway statements like this is genuine hardship is being obscured by word games. The disaster zones, which should be receiving aid, are being used as a stage for political theater. The question is not whether anyone starved, but whether the systems functioned properly to serve those who needed them. Otherwise, we risk letting every natural disaster become a political showground, while those truly in need must sit and wait for the slow bureaucracy of aid to tick over.
Shen Yan is an amateur musician.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
RSS