The steering committee of the National Stabilization Fund (NSF) on Thursday held a meeting to discuss domestic and international developments that could affect Taiwan’s stock market. The committee decided to allow the NT$500 billion (US$16.3 billion) fund to remain active to support local shares, as Taiwan-US tariff negotiations, as well as the results of a US investigation into semiconductors and other tech products, have not yet been finalized, begging caution.
The committee said that because uncertainties in international politics and the economy — such as rising financial assets amid easy monetary policy, ballooning global debt, inflation and escalating geopolitical conflicts — persist, the fund must continue implementing its market stabilization mission to maintain investor confidence and capital market stability.
The committee on April 8 activated the fund to shore up the local market amid panic-driven sell-offs triggered by US President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff announcement on April 2. The NSF invested NT$12.25 billion in local equities between April 9 and Sept. 30 and recorded NT$3.66 billion in unrealized gains and NT$40.92 million in dividend receivables, the committee’s latest report showed.
Taiwan’s shares surpassed 27,000 points to hit new highs last week, powered by booming demand for artificial intelligence and a rally in tech stocks abroad. The NSF helped support the local market and shored up investor confidence, with the TAIEX surging 9,910.16 points, or 56.98 percent, from April 9 to Thursday, Taiwan Stock Exchange data showed.
Given a sharp escalation in US-China trade tensions on Friday — triggered by Trump’s threats of new, massive tariffs on Chinese imports and Beijing’s reciprocal port fees and rare earth curbs — it is certainly understandable why there is cause for concern, and there is no harm in being cautious.
However, the discussion about the activation of the NSF remains divided. Some experts believe the pressure of the markets resembles an invisible hand that can allocate resources most effectively, so any interference would disrupt the market’s natural correction mechanism and distort stock price structure, while others believe the government’s direct support of local equities is a necessary institutional defense.
This kind of debate reflects the difficulty in striking a balance between free market policies and state intervention. No one can deny that the NSF has rarely disappointed investors. Each time it entered the market, it provided a short-term lift to stock prices and much-needed stability when market confidence was most fragile.
The stocks most frequently bought by the fund ranged from electronics and finance to traditional industries, and many of them were blue-chip stocks, which are viewed as a safe haven for investors once the market turns bearish.
To be sure, the activation of the NSF is a way to protect the market and maintain trust in the local investment environment and the country’s economic fundamentals. However, there is no guarantee that the momentum can be sustained in the months after the fund retreats, and investors looking for a longer-term investment should see fundamentals as a key consideration.
Friday came as a painful reminder for investors that tariffs are still a threat to the market, whether the NSF is in play or not. Even as tech enthusiasm buoys Taiwan and regional markets, once a trade war flares up, it could cast a shadow.
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
RSS