Between Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China (PRC), with which India shares a contested land border, India and its civil society seem to have moved much closer to the former, notwithstanding the lack of official diplomatic relations.
The relationship between India and Taiwan is evident in the growing popularity of Taiwanese brands, from electronics to bubble tea. Taiwan has proved over the years that it is not only a technological miracle, but also a democratic miracle.
India and Taiwan have calibrated the relationship between the two in a substantive way, with burgeoning economic engagement and people-to-people contact leveraging shared democratic values.
India does not accord diplomatic recognition to Taiwan because of its “one China” policy. However, there has been simultaneous engagement with Taiwan within the framework of that policy.
In 1992, Taiwan’s External Trade Development Council, a semi-official institution affiliated with the Ministry of Economic Affairs, set up a Taiwan Trade Center in Mumbai as a liaison office in charge of promoting trade with India.
The relationship was deepened in 1995 when the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center was set up in New Delhi to provide consular services and to facilitate other functions similar to an embassy. India also established the India Taipei Association as an equivalent institution in Taipei.
India is slowly shedding its diffidence to reach out to Taiwan. A report of the Indian parliament’s Standing Committee of External Affairs, headed by Indian politician Shashi Tharoor and presented to parliament in the wake of Doklam incident in the India-China-Bhutan border area in 2017 observed: “It comes as a matter of concern to the Committee that even when India is overly cautious about China’s sensitivities while dealing with Taiwan and Tibet, China does not exhibit the same deference while dealing with India’s sovereignty concerns, be it in the case of Arunachal Pradesh or that of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir... The Committee strongly feel that the Government should contemplate using all options including its relations with Taiwan, as part of such an approach.”
In April 2021, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs offered condolences to Taiwan after a major train crash in Taiwan killed 51 people. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs thanked India “for the expression of sentiment and support and said this genuinely friendly gesture will touch the people and bring Taiwan and India closer in a real and lasting manner.”
Although Taiwan is not a member of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, a security partnership of India, the US, Australia and Japan, its imperative resonates in the constellation of the Indo-Pacific edifice, as it is a bulwark against Chinese expansionism.
A blockade of Taiwan would have catastrophic consequences not only on regional geopolitics, but also the geopolitics of the world at large. Taiwan lies astride major maritime routes in the region, and conflict in the area would affect shipping across the world.
India has urged restraint and avoidance of unilateral action to change the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait and alluded to the militarization of Taiwan Strait. Freedom of navigation and sea lines of communication are seamlessly intertwined with Indo-Pacific architecture.
Rup Narayan Das is a former senior fellow at the Monohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, and was a Taiwan Fellow at National Chung Hsing University in Taiwan. The views expressed here are personal.
In the past month, two important developments are poised to equip Taiwan with expanded capabilities to play foreign policy offense in an age where Taiwan’s diplomatic space is seriously constricted by a hegemonic Beijing. Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) led a delegation of Taiwan and US companies to the Philippines to promote trilateral economic cooperation between the three countries. Additionally, in the past two weeks, Taiwan has placed chip export controls on South Africa in an escalating standoff over the placing of its diplomatic mission in Pretoria, causing the South Africans to pause and ask for consultations to resolve
An altercation involving a 73-year-old woman and a younger person broke out on a Taipei MRT train last week, with videos of the incident going viral online, sparking wide discussions about the controversial priority seats and social norms. In the video, the elderly woman, surnamed Tseng (曾), approached a passenger in a priority seat and demanded that she get up, and after she refused, she swung her bag, hitting her on the knees and calves several times. In return, the commuter asked a nearby passenger to hold her bag, stood up and kicked Tseng, causing her to fall backward and
In December 1937, Japanese troops captured Nanjing and unleashed one of the darkest chapters of the 20th century. Over six weeks, hundreds of thousands were slaughtered and women were raped on a scale that still defies comprehension. Across Asia, the Japanese occupation left deep scars. Singapore, Malaya, the Philippines and much of China endured terror, forced labor and massacres. My own grandfather was tortured by the Japanese in Singapore. His wife, traumatized beyond recovery, lived the rest of her life in silence and breakdown. These stories are real, not abstract history. Here is the irony: Mao Zedong (毛澤東) himself once told visiting
When I reminded my 83-year-old mother on Wednesday that it was the 76th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, she replied: “Yes, it was the day when my family was broken.” That answer captures the paradox of modern China. To most Chinese in mainland China, Oct. 1 is a day of pride — a celebration of national strength, prosperity and global stature. However, on a deeper level, it is also a reminder to many of the families shattered, the freedoms extinguished and the lives sacrificed on the road here. Seventy-six years ago, Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東)
RSS