Taiwan’s diplomatic situation has never been easy. Under constant pressure from China, every bit of space the nation gains on the international stage is a result of years of hard work by diplomats.
Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) has recently been making frequent visits overseas, drawing criticism from some voices within the country saying he is grandstanding.
Such remarks not only demonstrate a lack of understanding of Taiwan’s diplomatic reality, but also undermine the nation’s international image.
Since taking office, Lin has touted the concept of “integrated diplomacy,” emphasizing an integrated approach leveraging Taiwan’s democratic values, alliances and the global shift towards non-red supply chains to build comprehensive diplomatic momentum.
This is not just a slogan, but a pragmatic response to Taiwan’s situation. In an era where China is blocking Taiwan’s international participation on all fronts, if Taiwan fails to flexibly integrate its domestic and international strength, it would become even more difficult for it to find new footholds on the global stage.
Last month was Lin’s season of diplomacy. First, he left for the Czech Republic, Italy and Austria on Sept. 10 to engage in cultural diplomacy and hold discussions with local political leaders regarding economic and technological cooperation.
On Sept. 23, he met with diplomatic allies on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York, where he was photographed with Paraguayan President Santiago Pena.
On Sept. 27, he visited Poland to attend the 12th Warsaw Security Forum, where he delivered a keynote speech and brought Taiwan’s voice into European security discussions. Such an intense schedule is a heavy and thankless task.
Many diplomatic itineraries are much more challenging than they appear. As China becomes increasingly bold in its overseas intimidation tactics against Taiwan, the nation’s diplomats are working daily under immense pressure and risk to maintain their posts.
If the public continues to respond with indifference — or even mockery — it would not only fail to provide moral support to those defending the nation’s international presence, but could lead Taiwan’s international friends to mistakenly believe that even Taiwan itself lacks confidence in its own diplomatic efforts.
Taiwanese should move beyond our political differences and build consensus — not tear down or discredit our efforts. Only through unity can we give the nation’s diplomats the confidence to stand firm on the world stage.
At this moment, supporting Taiwan’s diplomatic work is not about supporting a particular political party — it is about protecting the nation’s national interests and space in the international community. This is the true spirit of Team Taiwan.
Wang Hung-jen is a professor in National Cheng Kung University’s Department of Political Science.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS