Twenty years ago, during my time at the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s Centers for Disease Control (CDC), I wrote the lyrics “treat disease prevention like fighting a war” to a song drawing on the martial spirit of preparing for and responding to war. After Taiwan’s experiences with enteroviruses and SARS, a professional, fast-response disease-prevention system was established.
Subsequent outbreaks of avian flu, influenza A H1N1 and dengue fever were all successfully contained. It would not be any stretch of the imagination to describe disease prevention and national defense as projects of the Buddhist idea of protecting life — husheng (護生).
Yet, some domestic anti-war academics still conflate anti-war principles with being anti-defense. They disregard rising aggression and jump to argue against arms procurement and resisting a Chinese invasion, even equating defense preparation with provocation. This logic is just as perverse as advocating for disease prevention while refusing to purchase vaccines, personal protective equipment or medicine.
Taiwan has long faced threats from Chinese military planes and missiles. If it cannot defend itself, the policy of maintaining “equal distance” in relations with China and the US will equal certain death.
I am a Buddhist who practices nonviolence in the spirit of protecting all life. However, that does not mean that I would not kill bacteria or eradicate mosquitoes. The same should go for national defense. Taiwan should not wage war or kill out of aggression, but should stand up to resist invaders to prevent a massacre of its own people. If being anti-war means opposing aggression, then I am anti-war. Refusing to prepare or resist is to give up on Taiwan.
Some pro-unification and anti-war academics oppose Taiwan preparing for war while ignoring Chinese arms expansion and nuclear intimidation. They single out Taiwan over arms procurements and call US arms sales “killing machines.” That is not being anti-war; it is capitulation.
The “treat disease prevention like fighting a war” principle was geared to safeguard the health of Taiwanese; “treat national defense as disease prevention” can likewise save lives. Being anti-war is not about refusing to prepare, but rather about maintaining deterrence so the opponent does not act rashly. This is Taiwan’s best chance for maintaining peace.
Recently appointed CDC Director-General Philip Lo’s (羅一鈞) plans to send disease-control physicians to Africa, and Taiwan sending a battalion of troops to the US for training are two sides of the same coin. Just as we make preparations to fight contagions to prevent epidemics, we must be prepared to resist invasion to prevent war.
Shih Wen-yi is a former deputy director-general of the Centers for Disease Control.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS