Twenty years ago, during my time at the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s Centers for Disease Control (CDC), I wrote the lyrics “treat disease prevention like fighting a war” to a song drawing on the martial spirit of preparing for and responding to war. After Taiwan’s experiences with enteroviruses and SARS, a professional, fast-response disease-prevention system was established.
Subsequent outbreaks of avian flu, influenza A H1N1 and dengue fever were all successfully contained. It would not be any stretch of the imagination to describe disease prevention and national defense as projects of the Buddhist idea of protecting life — husheng (護生).
Yet, some domestic anti-war academics still conflate anti-war principles with being anti-defense. They disregard rising aggression and jump to argue against arms procurement and resisting a Chinese invasion, even equating defense preparation with provocation. This logic is just as perverse as advocating for disease prevention while refusing to purchase vaccines, personal protective equipment or medicine.
Taiwan has long faced threats from Chinese military planes and missiles. If it cannot defend itself, the policy of maintaining “equal distance” in relations with China and the US will equal certain death.
I am a Buddhist who practices nonviolence in the spirit of protecting all life. However, that does not mean that I would not kill bacteria or eradicate mosquitoes. The same should go for national defense. Taiwan should not wage war or kill out of aggression, but should stand up to resist invaders to prevent a massacre of its own people. If being anti-war means opposing aggression, then I am anti-war. Refusing to prepare or resist is to give up on Taiwan.
Some pro-unification and anti-war academics oppose Taiwan preparing for war while ignoring Chinese arms expansion and nuclear intimidation. They single out Taiwan over arms procurements and call US arms sales “killing machines.” That is not being anti-war; it is capitulation.
The “treat disease prevention like fighting a war” principle was geared to safeguard the health of Taiwanese; “treat national defense as disease prevention” can likewise save lives. Being anti-war is not about refusing to prepare, but rather about maintaining deterrence so the opponent does not act rashly. This is Taiwan’s best chance for maintaining peace.
Recently appointed CDC Director-General Philip Lo’s (羅一鈞) plans to send disease-control physicians to Africa, and Taiwan sending a battalion of troops to the US for training are two sides of the same coin. Just as we make preparations to fight contagions to prevent epidemics, we must be prepared to resist invasion to prevent war.
Shih Wen-yi is a former deputy director-general of the Centers for Disease Control.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS