Both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) love to boast in their textbooks that “the Chinese nation is a peace-loving people.” Yet the vast empire that grew from what was once merely the Central Plains around today’s Henan Province and the middle-to-lower Yellow River valley was not the product of a love of peace.
On the contrary: The formation of a great empire was achieved through military expansion — what the KMT textbooks praise as “remarkable martial achievement with widespread renown.” Alongside those martial exploits, there was the policy of yimin shibian (移民實邊, “immigrating to secure the border”).
What is yimin shibian? It refers to the practice of rulers sending settlers to border regions to increase their strength in rule and defense, while also exerting cultural assimilation and economic control.
For example, in the second century BC, the Han Dynasty’s Emperor Wu (漢武帝) implemented the tuntian (屯田, military-agricultural colonies) system, dispatching Han settlers to frontier regions such as the Western Regions and Nanyue to cultivate land; during the Tang Dynasty, large numbers of Han moved into the Hexi Corridor, Sichuan, Yunnan and other borderlands. Under the Qing Dynasty, Han settlers were sent in large numbers to Russian border zones, and to East Turkestan (Xinjiang) and other frontier areas, clearing land and strengthening control.
These are historical precedents of China’s yimin shibian, and they bear profound and far-reaching effects on territory expansion, governance and cultural assimilation.
Does the People’s Republic of China (PRC) have such a policy today? Certainly — and perhaps more fiercely than ever. Besides imposing brutal repression over Tibet and East Turkestan, Beijing is also relocating large numbers of Han Chinese into these regions. It has redrawn Tibet’s territorial map, annexing much of what was traditionally eastern and western Tibet into the provinces of Sichuan, Yunnan, Gansu and Qinghai. It moved in large numbers of Han people, intending to render Tibetans a minority to facilitate control.
The same holds true in modern Xinjiang: China has been mass-settling Han there (at one point in 1996 allegedly moving 10,000 people in a single day), making Uighurs local minorities. What is more, Han immigrants are allocated areas with ready access to water, leaving local farmers deprived of water so that many are forced to abandon farming and seek other work.
Taiwan is not a territory under the jurisdiction of the PRC. Can Beijing still carry out yimin shibian here?
It does. By indirect means — through marriage and immigration. According to data from the National Immigration Agency, by the end of February last year there were more than 384,000 Chinese spouses who had moved to Taiwan.
Of course, if these marriages were genuinely rooted in mutual affection, one cannot do anything but offer blessings.
However, while the divorce rate among Taiwanese is about 10 percent, it is as high as 45 percent within cross-strait marriages — evidence that many claim prove those marriages are used as a vehicle to obtain residency in Taiwan, only to divorce immediately after gaining citizenship.
The number of Chinese spouses who have divorced in Taiwan has reached 150,000, and it continues to grow.
These individuals — and by extension their families — exploit the National Health Insurance and labor pension systems, and even inheritance laws. After divorce, they still allow relatives to claim dependence, and those relatives continue to enjoy health insurance benefits — resembling an armada of corpse collectors, reaping the benefits of Taiwanese society. If this continues, Taiwan’s health insurance system might be undermined.
Furthermore, Chinese spouses retain the right to vote even after divorce, thus influencing elections. While Taiwanese have to be 20 to vote, Chinese spouses only need six years of residency in Taiwan.
The KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party are trying to instate legislation that reduces the six years to four, speeding up the acquisition of Taiwanese identity documents among Chinese spouses — helping the CCP accelerate its demographic influence. This indirect strategy of yimin shibian is seemingly being executed by proxies of the CCP in the Legislative Yuan.
After divorce, Chinese spouses ought to have their Taiwanese identity and health insurance eligibility canceled to end the practice of sham marriages for residency.
You might ask: What about spouses from other countries who divorce — why not treat them the same? Because those countries (unlike China) have no designs to annex Taiwan; none are attempting to pursue an immigration-backed reshaping of our national configuration.
Moreover, the government must extinguish legislative acts that amount to disguised trade or service-trade pacts such as the Offshore Islands Development Act (離島建設條例), which introduce Chinese hospitals, Chinese capital and country of origin laundering for China — because this, too, is another variant of yimin shibian.
Taiwanese must stop electing representatives who allow Taiwan to dissolve into China’s domestic affairs, allowing China to successfully orchestrate cultural and ethnic submersion via their proxies in the legislature.
Lee Hsiao-feng is an honorary professor at National Taipei University of Education.
Translated by Lenna Veronica Suminski
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS