When a Reuters reporter asked Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lin Jian (林劍) about Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung’s (林佳龍) European tour, Lin Jian expressed displeasure, referring to Lin Chia-lung as “merely a local foreign affairs official in China,” and reiterating the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) oft-used claim that Taiwan is a Chinese “province.”
This response is a political falsehood. Although such statements have become standard fare in the CCP’s external messaging, they expose its deepest anxieties. The CCP fears confronting international reality and is even unnerved by the prospect of Taiwan’s subjectivity on the world stage.
The CCP asserts that Taiwan is a “province,” yet it keeps an eye on every diplomatic engagement Taiwan undertakes, condemning international governments and officials who interact with Taiwanese representatives. This absurd contradiction exposes how the CCP has trapped itself in its own logical inconsistency under the fallacy of its so-called “one China” principle. If Taiwan were truly just a province of China, why would the CCP treat Taiwan’s diplomatic visits as matters of importance, guarding against them at all costs?
If a Chinese province can conduct foreign exchanges as it wishes, then why have we not seen the mayor of Chongqing or the secretary of the Fujian Provincial Committee make diplomatic visits? Taiwan is not part of China, and every international engagement by Taiwan’s foreign minister stands as an intolerable affront to reality for the CCP.
Lin Jian’s speech and attitude not only reflect the CCP’s persistent rhetoric aimed at degrading Taiwan, but also reveal its deep fear of Taiwan’s democracy and expanding international presence. Lin Jian uses “China’s sovereignty” as an excuse, attempting to deny Taiwan’s existence, while concealing the fact that the CCP could not stop Taiwan’s diplomatic progress. As such statements are frequently repeated, the international community could see the CCP’s true nature as a bully toward Taiwan and might come to recognize the legitimacy of Taiwan as an independent nation.
Lin Chia-lung’s trip to Europe symbolizes democratic Taiwan’s continued drive to deepen international collaboration, demonstrating that Taiwan’s self-directed diplomacy is gaining recognition and support worldwide. If the CCP persists in its self-deception that Taiwan is a “province” of China, while ignoring Taiwan’s legal status and statehood in the international order, it would ultimately forfeit its credibility and its power of discourse in competing with Taiwan.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Lai Wen-chieh
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS