When a Reuters reporter asked Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lin Jian (林劍) about Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung’s (林佳龍) European tour, Lin Jian expressed displeasure, referring to Lin Chia-lung as “merely a local foreign affairs official in China,” and reiterating the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) oft-used claim that Taiwan is a Chinese “province.”
This response is a political falsehood. Although such statements have become standard fare in the CCP’s external messaging, they expose its deepest anxieties. The CCP fears confronting international reality and is even unnerved by the prospect of Taiwan’s subjectivity on the world stage.
The CCP asserts that Taiwan is a “province,” yet it keeps an eye on every diplomatic engagement Taiwan undertakes, condemning international governments and officials who interact with Taiwanese representatives. This absurd contradiction exposes how the CCP has trapped itself in its own logical inconsistency under the fallacy of its so-called “one China” principle. If Taiwan were truly just a province of China, why would the CCP treat Taiwan’s diplomatic visits as matters of importance, guarding against them at all costs?
If a Chinese province can conduct foreign exchanges as it wishes, then why have we not seen the mayor of Chongqing or the secretary of the Fujian Provincial Committee make diplomatic visits? Taiwan is not part of China, and every international engagement by Taiwan’s foreign minister stands as an intolerable affront to reality for the CCP.
Lin Jian’s speech and attitude not only reflect the CCP’s persistent rhetoric aimed at degrading Taiwan, but also reveal its deep fear of Taiwan’s democracy and expanding international presence. Lin Jian uses “China’s sovereignty” as an excuse, attempting to deny Taiwan’s existence, while concealing the fact that the CCP could not stop Taiwan’s diplomatic progress. As such statements are frequently repeated, the international community could see the CCP’s true nature as a bully toward Taiwan and might come to recognize the legitimacy of Taiwan as an independent nation.
Lin Chia-lung’s trip to Europe symbolizes democratic Taiwan’s continued drive to deepen international collaboration, demonstrating that Taiwan’s self-directed diplomacy is gaining recognition and support worldwide. If the CCP persists in its self-deception that Taiwan is a “province” of China, while ignoring Taiwan’s legal status and statehood in the international order, it would ultimately forfeit its credibility and its power of discourse in competing with Taiwan.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Lai Wen-chieh
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
RSS