The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) on Sept. 12 publicly stated that World War II-related documents do not determine Taiwan’s ultimate political status. This statement is correct.
Japan’s surrender of Taiwan and Penghu to the Republic of China (ROC) on Oct. 25, 1945 — Taiwan’s so-called “Retrocession Day” — was merely a political show under ROC military occupation.
From the standpoint of international law, it was unlawful and without effect. When the Treaty of San Francisco came into force on April 28, 1952, Japan formally renounced sovereignty over Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, yet the treaty did not designate a recipient. As a result, their legal status remained unresolved.
Although the ROC was in Taiwan at the time, Japan never formally transferred sovereignty to it after the war.
However, to legitimize the claim that the ROC took over Taiwan, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) issued a stern response to the AIT, asserting that there is no doubt that Taiwan’s sovereignty belongs to the ROC. It cited the 1952 Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty, also known as the Treaty of Taipei, saying that articles 3 and 10 “reaffirm the status of Taiwan and Penghu as belonging to the ROC.”
However, this is a complete misinterpretation of the Treaty of Taipei by the KMT. Articles 3 and 10 are evidence that Japan did not recognize Taiwan and Penghu as belonging to the ROC.
Article 3 states: “The disposition of property of Japan and of its nationals in Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores), and their claims, including debts, against the authorities of the Republic of China in Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) and the residents thereof, and the disposition in Japan of property of such authorities and residents and their claims, including debts, against Japan and its nationals.”
Japanese are referred to as “nationals,” while those in Taiwan and Penghu are referred to as “residents,” not nationals of the ROC.
Article 10 states: “For the purposes of the present treaty, nationals of the Republic of China, shall be deemed to include all the inhabitants and former inhabitants of Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) and their descendants who are of the Chinese nationality”
Instead of saying that “ROC nationals include the residents of Taiwan and Penghu,” it uses the phrase “shall be deemed to include.” How should the language of the articles be interpreted?
The original Japanese text uses a phrase that can be translated as “deemed to include,” while the official English version says “shall be deemed to include.” This shows that people living in Taiwan and Penghu were not originally nationals of the ROC — they are merely presumed to be for the purpose of the treaty.
While Japan signed the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty to end the war between Japan and the ROC, that does not mean Japan recognized Taiwan and Penghu as belonging to the ROC. As a party to the treaty, the KMT could not possibly have been unaware of that.
It is not only the US, but also, at a minimum, states such as Japan, the UK, Australia, France and Canada, as parties to the Treaty of San Francisco, that originally held that Taiwan’s status remained undetermined.
However, out of concern over the reaction of the People’s Republic of China or the ROC, most countries refrained from making public statements on the matter, although some later accepted the so-called “one China” principle.
Hideki Nagayama is chairman of the Taiwan Research Forum.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
A 50-year-old on Wednesday last week died while under anesthesia at a Taipei cosmetic clinic shortly after undergoing a penis enlargement procedure. The surgeon was arrested for suspected medical malpractice, again bringing to the surface shortcomings in the regulation of cosmetic medicine. Media reports said the clinic owner and surgeon, surnamed Ting (丁), was previously convicted of negligent homicide for a postsurgical death and had been charged with coercion and aggravated assault after allegedly stopping a patient from calling for an ambulance. He had also been fined for failing inspections and had allegedly permitted people without medical licenses to assist
It was most annoying last week to read Chairman Xi Jinping’s (習近平) fulsome encomium to the People’s Liberation Army during the Eightieth Anniversary celebrations of victory over Japan in World War II. Comrade Xi’s soaring rhetoric was stuffed with “martyrs, sacrifice, solemnity and unwavering resolve” in praise of the “Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.” His aspirations overflowed with “world peace” and love of the United Nations, of which China is a founding member. The Liberation Army Daily said that every word from General Secretary Xi Jinping “resounded in his powerful voice, illuminating the
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently sat down for an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson in which he openly acknowledged that ChatGPT’s model behavior is indeed influencing the entire world, and that he himself is responsible for the decisions related to the bot’s moral framework. He said that he has not had a good night of sleep since its launch, as the technology could bring about unpredictable consequences. Although the discussion took place in the US, it is closely related to Taiwan. While Altman worries about the concentration of power, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has already weaponized artificial