The main contenders for the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Oct. 18 chairmanship election are Legislator Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強), 55; former legislator Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), 56; Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), 71; and former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), 73. Each brings distinct strengths to the race.
The election would be a battle between generations. Yet, when measured against four key benchmarks — attracting young voters, acting as a “kingmaker” in 2028, consolidating cooperation between the blue and white camps, and leading the KMT legislative caucus — no single candidate checks all the boxes.
An Apollo Survey & Research Co poll showed Cheng leading with 22.2 percent support among party members, followed by Hau at 20.5 percent, Lo at 18.7 percent and Chang at 5.3 percent. However, 26.8 percent of respondents withheld their views, leaving a significant variable in play.
Cheng and Lo, both in their mid-50s, represent the middle-aged cohort. Skilled in debate and adept at framing issues, they frequently appear on political talk shows and are effective offensively and defensively. Should either prevail, the election would highlight the KMT’s “alteration of generations.”
The KMT’s rising political stars, such as Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) and Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), are also in the middle-aged bracket, while many of the party’s lawmakers and councilors are in their 30s. That creates a fresher image for the party, which is favorable in expanding its appeal to younger voters.
KMT supporters also expect the party to project a younger and more dynamic profile. If a middle-aged chairman emerges victorious, the result would align with public expectations and be seen as a positive development for the pan-blue camp.
However, questions of seniority complicate matters. Hau, an experienced politician, is regarded as decent and friendly. Chang is known for his theoretical rigor and his blunt critiques of the KMT’s lack of core narratives. Yet the average age of KMT members skews older, meaning the party’s internal preferences might not reflect broader social demographics. Cross-tab analysis of the Apollo poll highlights the strengths and limitations of the three leading contenders.
For example, Hau draws most of his support from KMT members aged 75 and older, while Cheng and Lo are favored by younger and middle-aged cohorts. Yet Cheng and Lo struggle to appeal to senior members, just as Hau has difficulty resonating with younger voters. That shows the limitations each faces in broadening support across age groups.
The new chairman’s foremost task would be to win over younger and middle-aged voters to expand the party’s support base. In that respect, Cheng and Lo have an advantage: Both are positioned to play the role of “kingmaker” in 2028 and to consolidate the blue-white alliance.
Hau, while weaker in these areas, has the edge in commanding the KMT legislative caucus, where his political seniority has earned him respect from caucus whips and senior lawmakers.
Ultimately, each candidate brings distinct strengths, but falls short of meeting all main benchmarks. As such, party members might have to settle for a perceived second best, choosing the candidate who can fulfill three of the four criteria, thereby offering the KMT its best chance of securing a path to victory.
Niu Tse-hsun is a professor in Chinese Culture University’s advertising department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS