The main contenders for the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Oct. 18 chairmanship election are Legislator Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強), 55; former legislator Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), 56; Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), 71; and former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), 73. Each brings distinct strengths to the race.
The election would be a battle between generations. Yet, when measured against four key benchmarks — attracting young voters, acting as a “kingmaker” in 2028, consolidating cooperation between the blue and white camps, and leading the KMT legislative caucus — no single candidate checks all the boxes.
An Apollo Survey & Research Co poll showed Cheng leading with 22.2 percent support among party members, followed by Hau at 20.5 percent, Lo at 18.7 percent and Chang at 5.3 percent. However, 26.8 percent of respondents withheld their views, leaving a significant variable in play.
Cheng and Lo, both in their mid-50s, represent the middle-aged cohort. Skilled in debate and adept at framing issues, they frequently appear on political talk shows and are effective offensively and defensively. Should either prevail, the election would highlight the KMT’s “alteration of generations.”
The KMT’s rising political stars, such as Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) and Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), are also in the middle-aged bracket, while many of the party’s lawmakers and councilors are in their 30s. That creates a fresher image for the party, which is favorable in expanding its appeal to younger voters.
KMT supporters also expect the party to project a younger and more dynamic profile. If a middle-aged chairman emerges victorious, the result would align with public expectations and be seen as a positive development for the pan-blue camp.
However, questions of seniority complicate matters. Hau, an experienced politician, is regarded as decent and friendly. Chang is known for his theoretical rigor and his blunt critiques of the KMT’s lack of core narratives. Yet the average age of KMT members skews older, meaning the party’s internal preferences might not reflect broader social demographics. Cross-tab analysis of the Apollo poll highlights the strengths and limitations of the three leading contenders.
For example, Hau draws most of his support from KMT members aged 75 and older, while Cheng and Lo are favored by younger and middle-aged cohorts. Yet Cheng and Lo struggle to appeal to senior members, just as Hau has difficulty resonating with younger voters. That shows the limitations each faces in broadening support across age groups.
The new chairman’s foremost task would be to win over younger and middle-aged voters to expand the party’s support base. In that respect, Cheng and Lo have an advantage: Both are positioned to play the role of “kingmaker” in 2028 and to consolidate the blue-white alliance.
Hau, while weaker in these areas, has the edge in commanding the KMT legislative caucus, where his political seniority has earned him respect from caucus whips and senior lawmakers.
Ultimately, each candidate brings distinct strengths, but falls short of meeting all main benchmarks. As such, party members might have to settle for a perceived second best, choosing the candidate who can fulfill three of the four criteria, thereby offering the KMT its best chance of securing a path to victory.
Niu Tse-hsun is a professor in Chinese Culture University’s advertising department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently sat down for an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson in which he openly acknowledged that ChatGPT’s model behavior is indeed influencing the entire world, and that he himself is responsible for the decisions related to the bot’s moral framework. He said that he has not had a good night of sleep since its launch, as the technology could bring about unpredictable consequences. Although the discussion took place in the US, it is closely related to Taiwan. While Altman worries about the concentration of power, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has already weaponized artificial
RSS