Walk into almost any classroom in Taiwan and you could see students bent over worksheets, memorizing facts, drilling formulas and preparing for tests. On paper, many succeed. The truth is that passing exams is different from preparing for life.
Taiwanese students are bright, hardworking and resilient. However, when a system prizes test scores above all else, it risks leaving students unprepared for the challenges of the 21st century. Employers today do not just want high scorers; they want problem solvers, team players and creative thinkers.
The future would not reward the best test takers. It would reward those who can adapt, collaborate and apply knowledge in unpredictable situations.
Exams measure content knowledge, but they do not reward curiosity, creativity or emotional intelligence. They cannot capture resilience, empathy or intercultural understanding — all skills that help students thrive in fast-changing societies.
What is missing is balance. Students need space to grow not only intellectually, but also emotionally and socially. They need to practice communication, teamwork, leadership and self-awareness. These skills are as essential as math and science.
Taiwan’s 12-Year Basic Education Curriculum already aims to move beyond exams, but implementation has been uneven. Some schools still cling to old models, while others experiment with project-based learning, bilingual education and character education. Consistency is needed.
The same pattern could be observed globally. Countries that focus only on standardized testing might achieve high rankings in the short term, but they often struggle with creativity, entrepreneurship and mental health in the long run. Conversely, systems that balance academic and non-cognitive skills — such as Finland’s emphasis on creativity and social development — produce students who are capable and confident.
Education is not just about producing workers for the economy. It is about shaping human beings. When schools ignore emotional intelligence, they risk graduating students who can calculate equations, but cannot manage stress, resolve conflict or collaborate effectively.
Emotional well-being is not a luxury. It is the foundation for learning. Students who feel safe, respected and valued learn better. When classrooms encourage empathy, creativity and resilience, they prepare students not only for tests, but for relationships, leadership and citizenship.
Teachers should lend project-based learning into core subjects. Use role-plays, reflections and group work to explicitly teach emotional intelligence. Celebrate diverse achievements, not just high scores.
Schools need to revive creative and technical subjects.
Integrate cultural learning into lessons, showing students the strengths of different traditions. Assess portfolios, projects and teamwork alongside exams.
Policymakers should provide funding that allows schools to diversify curricula. Train teachers in emotional literacy and culturally responsive teaching. Partner with industries and communities to keep curricula relevant to real life.
Taiwanese students deserve an education that prepares them for the full complexity of life. By balancing cognitive and non-cognitive learning, and valuing character as much as test scores, Taiwan can build a generation that is intellectually sharp and emotionally strong.
Curriculum is power. It shapes not just what students know, but who they become. If Taiwan wants its young people to thrive, then the time has come to move beyond exams.
Casper J. H. Keller is an educator with experience in Asia and Africa. He holds a master’s degree in education and an MBA, and is teaching English and drama at Yuemei Elementary School in Taitung County.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS