In an alarming escalation of diplomatic coercion, the Chinese government has imposed sanctions on Hei Seki, a naturalized Japanese citizen, member of the Japanese House of Councilors and an outspoken critic of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The sanctions include an assets freeze, a ban on transactions with Chinese entities, and a prohibition on entry into China, Hong Kong and Macau for Seki and his immediate family.
Beijing accuses him of “spreading fallacies” about Taiwan, Tibet, Xinjiang and the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) — called the Senkaku Islands in Japan — issues that, while sensitive to China, fall squarely within the realm of legitimate political discourse in Japan.
This move is not merely a diplomatic rebuke — it is a direct affront to Japan’s sovereignty and democratic norms. By targeting a sitting Japanese lawmaker for his views, China has crossed a line from bilateral disagreement into extraterritorial censorship. It is an attempt to export its authoritarian intolerance of dissent into the heart of Japan’s parliamentary system.
DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS
Seki’s political positions — whether one agrees with them or not — are protected under Japan’s constitutional guarantees of free speech and democratic representation.
His critiques of Beijing’s policies on Taiwan and Tibet reflect not only personal conviction, but also a broader concern shared by many in Japan and across the democratic world: that China’s expanding influence is increasingly backed by punitive measures designed to silence critics abroad.
Seki himself has called the sanctions a “farce,” saying he has no assets in China or any plans to visit the country.
The sanctions are also deeply ironic. China accuses Seki of interfering in its internal affairs, yet it is Beijing that now seeks to interfere in Japan’s domestic politics by punishing a lawmaker for exercising his mandate.
This inversion of sovereignty — where a foreign power seeks to dictate the boundaries of acceptable speech within another nation’s legislature — should alarm every democracy.
DIASPORIC VOICES
The targeting of Seki, a China-born Japanese citizen, carries troubling implications for diasporic voices. It sends a chilling message to ethnic Chinese who have chosen democratic societies: Their political views might still be policed by Beijing, regardless of their citizenship or allegiance. This is not only a sanction, but is also a warning shot aimed at transnational dissent.
Japan must respond not with retaliation, but with resolve. The integrity of its democratic institutions depends on its ability to protect elected officials from foreign intimidation.
Supporting Hei Seki is not about endorsing every word he has spoken — it is about defending the principle that lawmakers in a free society must be free to speak.
ALLIED UNITY
In the face of authoritarian overreach, silence is complicity. Japan’s allies, especially those in the Indo-Pacific region, should recognize this moment for what it is: A test of democratic resilience.
Seki might have no assets in China and no intention of visiting the nation, but the principle at stake is priceless. It is the right of a sovereign nation to govern itself, speak freely and resist the creeping shadow of censorship from abroad.
We must all stand together to support Seki — not just for his sake, but for the sake of every democracy that refuses to be dictated to.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) last week made a rare visit to the Philippines, which not only deepened bilateral economic ties, but also signaled a diplomatic breakthrough in the face of growing tensions with China. Lin’s trip marks the second-known visit by a Taiwanese foreign minister since Manila and Beijing established diplomatic ties in 1975; then-minister Chang Hsiao-yen (章孝嚴) took a “vacation” in the Philippines in 1997. As Taiwan is one of the Philippines’ top 10 economic partners, Lin visited Manila and other cities to promote the Taiwan-Philippines Economic Corridor, with an eye to connecting it with the Luzon