In an alarming escalation of diplomatic coercion, the Chinese government has imposed sanctions on Hei Seki, a naturalized Japanese citizen, member of the Japanese House of Councilors and an outspoken critic of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The sanctions include an assets freeze, a ban on transactions with Chinese entities, and a prohibition on entry into China, Hong Kong and Macau for Seki and his immediate family.
Beijing accuses him of “spreading fallacies” about Taiwan, Tibet, Xinjiang and the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) — called the Senkaku Islands in Japan — issues that, while sensitive to China, fall squarely within the realm of legitimate political discourse in Japan.
This move is not merely a diplomatic rebuke — it is a direct affront to Japan’s sovereignty and democratic norms. By targeting a sitting Japanese lawmaker for his views, China has crossed a line from bilateral disagreement into extraterritorial censorship. It is an attempt to export its authoritarian intolerance of dissent into the heart of Japan’s parliamentary system.
DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS
Seki’s political positions — whether one agrees with them or not — are protected under Japan’s constitutional guarantees of free speech and democratic representation.
His critiques of Beijing’s policies on Taiwan and Tibet reflect not only personal conviction, but also a broader concern shared by many in Japan and across the democratic world: that China’s expanding influence is increasingly backed by punitive measures designed to silence critics abroad.
Seki himself has called the sanctions a “farce,” saying he has no assets in China or any plans to visit the country.
The sanctions are also deeply ironic. China accuses Seki of interfering in its internal affairs, yet it is Beijing that now seeks to interfere in Japan’s domestic politics by punishing a lawmaker for exercising his mandate.
This inversion of sovereignty — where a foreign power seeks to dictate the boundaries of acceptable speech within another nation’s legislature — should alarm every democracy.
DIASPORIC VOICES
The targeting of Seki, a China-born Japanese citizen, carries troubling implications for diasporic voices. It sends a chilling message to ethnic Chinese who have chosen democratic societies: Their political views might still be policed by Beijing, regardless of their citizenship or allegiance. This is not only a sanction, but is also a warning shot aimed at transnational dissent.
Japan must respond not with retaliation, but with resolve. The integrity of its democratic institutions depends on its ability to protect elected officials from foreign intimidation.
Supporting Hei Seki is not about endorsing every word he has spoken — it is about defending the principle that lawmakers in a free society must be free to speak.
ALLIED UNITY
In the face of authoritarian overreach, silence is complicity. Japan’s allies, especially those in the Indo-Pacific region, should recognize this moment for what it is: A test of democratic resilience.
Seki might have no assets in China and no intention of visiting the nation, but the principle at stake is priceless. It is the right of a sovereign nation to govern itself, speak freely and resist the creeping shadow of censorship from abroad.
We must all stand together to support Seki — not just for his sake, but for the sake of every democracy that refuses to be dictated to.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
RSS