Reading Lee Min-yung’s (李敏勇) article (“Taiwanese must unite to protect our nation,” Aug. 16, page 8) about Taiwan’s unfinished nationhood struck a chord with me. His reminder that Taiwan must raise its own banner of identity reminded me of my story as a Hong Konger born in the 1960s who lived through the loss of that very freedom.
Hong Kong was ceded to the UK in 1842 and remained under British rule for 155 years. It grew from a fishing port into an international financial center — once dubbed the “Pearl of the Orient.” These achievements had nothing to do with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
After 1949, China sank into poverty, famine and human-caused disasters. Only after Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) reforms in 1978 did China begin to open up, and it was Hong Kong entrepreneurs who crossed the border to invest and drive the mainland’s growth.
Life under British rule was hardly perfect, but it was freer and more dignified than what came later. We were not persecuted, discriminated against nor forced to recite national slogans about loyalty to the UK or love for the queen. We were not even taught British history. Instead, we were given access to the international language — English — without losing Chinese language, literature or history.
There was a period of corruption, but from the 1970s onward, governance became clean and efficient. The rule of law prevailed and freedom of speech was protected. There was space to simply be Hong Kongers. Everything thrived. Cantonese cinema and pop music became cultural touchstones across Asia — even in a closed-off China.
That is the root of our nostalgia. We do not long to be British. We long for the ability to remain Hong Kongers, with our freedoms intact.
That space began to close in 1997, and after Hong Kong’s National Security Law went into effect, it has been crushed.
Now children are taught to love China, be loyal to the CCP and memorize rewritten history. A teenager who turned his back during the national anthem in a stadium was arrested and charged. Voices of dissent have been silenced and imprisoned. Social media is under surveillance. Posting or sharing anything critical of the government or China risks bringing down the sledgehammer of the national security police. Policies on education, welfare, immigration and business are drafted not for Hong Kongers, but to please Beijing.
That is what we mourn — the loss of freedom, dignity and identity.
We are Chinese by blood and culture, but our national identity has been hijacked by the CCP. To admit being Chinese and be told to take pride in it is to accept the values of an oppressive regime. That is what Hong Kongers cannot embrace — yet are forced to submit to.
Asked where we come from, we say: “Hong Kong,” deliberately omitting “China.” Officially, saying just “Hong Kong” is no longer allowed.
I envy Taiwanese, because they still have what Hong Kong lost: democracy, freedom of expression and the ability to call themselves Taiwanese without hesitation. I fear for Taiwan, because I know how quickly these things could disappear if they are not defended.
Many in Taiwan might think the danger is abstract, that the “China problem” is a matter of distant politics. That is what many Hong Kongers thought, too. We lived our daily lives, proud to call ourselves Hong Kongers, assuming it would last. Then one day, it did not.
Hong Kong is a testament to how swiftly freedom could vanish. Taiwan must keep watch without rest.
When the Japanese flag came down in 1945, Taiwan forgot to raise its own. Hong Kong never had the chance. Taiwan still does.
John Cheng is a retired businessman from Hong Kong now living in Taiwan.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS