Civic movement a milestone
The recall votes on July 26 and yesterday have concluded. The chief reason none succeeded was the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) ability to mobilize its members, including party workers under investigation for forging documents, many of whom have already admitted guilt. At the same time, the KMT attempted to paint itself as a victim of a “judicial witch hunt,” seeking to rally sympathy from its supporters.
Yet there is much to take pride in. The sheer number of ballots cast in favor of the recalls makes clear that the petitioners and citizens who backed these efforts did not lose. On the contrary, they carved out a new milestone in Taiwan’s struggle for freedom and democracy.
The recalls unfolded over three demanding stages: petitioning, voting and grassroots campaigning. Volunteers stood for hours on street corners in the winter chill and under the sweltering summer sun; civic groups organized public hearings and engaged voters face to face. All of this was carried out lawfully, transparently and with an unwavering commitment to principle. The recalls did not unseat any legislators, but the movement is a testament to the strength of Taiwan’s democracy and the awakening of civic groups, with citizens making their voices heard and contributing constructively to the legal process. Their efforts deserve recognition and gratitude.
Although the recalls ultimately failed, the process should serve as a sobering lesson for legislators from the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party. It is a reminder that they cannot act with impunity. Hopefully, they would recognize the need to respect constitutional government, uphold the proper functioning of democratic institutions and abandon their attempts at power grabs and sowing chaos.
The selfless dedication of civic groups and volunteers has been plain for all to see. For the sake of the nation’s continued development, social harmony and stability, their oversight must not end here.
These groups should continue to hold legislators accountable, shining a light on misconduct and inappropriate behavior to ensure that the legislature serves the good of the country and not merely the partisan interests of the blue camp.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
Many foreigners, particularly Germans, are struck by the efficiency of Taiwan’s administration in routine matters. Driver’s licenses, household registrations and similar procedures are handled swiftly, often decided on the spot, and occasionally even accompanied by preferential treatment. However, this efficiency does not extend to all areas of government. Any foreigner with long-term residency in Taiwan — just like any Taiwanese — would have encountered the opposite: agencies, most notably the police, refusing to accept complaints and sending applicants away at the counter without consideration. This kind of behavior, although less common in other agencies, still occurs far too often. Two cases