Voters returned to the polls on Saturday for the second time in less than a month to cast ballots in seven legislative districts on recall motions targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers. None succeeded. At the same time, a KMT-backed national referendum on nuclear power also failed to clear the legal threshold.
Soon after the results were clear, President William Lai (賴清德) addressed the nation.
While praising civic groups behind the largest mass recall election since Taiwan’s democratization, his main message was that Taiwanese have shown their determination “to safeguard freedom and democracy.”
However, he also expressed hope for dialogue and cooperation with the opposition and talked about Cabinet adjustments and pledged better engagement with the KMT-led opposition-majority legislature.
Some reshuffling has already begun, with Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝), Minister of Digital Affairs Huang Yen-nun (黃彥男) and Deputy Minister of Education Yeh Ping-cheng (葉丙成) stepping down.
It is clear that not only does the public expect change, but younger voters feel increasingly disengaged. United Microelectronics Corp founder Robert Tsao (曹興誠), a driving force behind the campaigns, attributed the lack of turnout among Taiwanese younger than 30 to Chinese Communist Party influence via Chinese social media.
Yet despite Beijing’s malign efforts, surveys show younger Taiwanese overwhelmingly identify solely as Taiwanese. The challenge for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is that this generation has come of age under its administrations. For many younger Taiwanese, the DPP is the establishment, and frustrations over livelihoods or policy failures naturally translate into discontent with the ruling party.
Lai outlined “four priorities”: the economy, livelihoods, vulnerable groups and young people. If reinforced with concrete policies that resonate with younger generations, this agenda could help him and the DPP secure future electoral victories. The party’s crushing defeat in the 2018 local elections was reversed in 2020, with younger voters powering then-president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) landslide re-election.
During the Sunflower movement, my conversations with students and graduates revealed concerns beyond the defense of Taiwan’s freedom and democracy. Many worried about how opening the economy to China without adequate safeguards could threaten their livelihoods.
Since Tsai’s presidency, DPP administrations have prioritized strengthening national defense. Taiwan’s military ties with the US and regional partners continue to deepen, and Lai has pledged to raise defense spending to 5 percent of GDP by 2030. Yet the DPP’s long-standing message of “resist China, protect Taiwan” might no longer be sufficient on its own to secure the support of younger voters.
Lai’s speech was a step in the right direction, but the real test lies ahead. Much would depend on how the DPP works with the opposition and addresses the kitchen-table concerns that dominate the minds of younger and swing voters — together accounting for more than half of Taiwan’s electorate.
Issues such as soaring housing prices and stagnant wages are among voters’ top priorities.
Safeguarding Taiwan from Chinese annexation would require not only credible defense capabilities, but also an economy in which people feel secure, empowered and financially sustained.
Rath Wang is a senior policy fellow at Safe Spaces, a consulting firm based in Taipei and Washington. He is a producer and host of political talk shows and podcasts and has worked on political campaigns and advocacies in Taiwan and the US. He can be reached at rathwang@safespacesllc.com.
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS