In the debate over restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, supporters often cite the Palisades plant in Michigan as a comparison, since both use pressurized water reactors. Yet a closer look shows that the inspection and review process for Ma-anshan’s extension would be far longer and more complex than advocates suggest, and the fundamental differences and safety risks between the two plants cannot be overlooked.
The Palisades plant began operating in 1971. In 2005, its operator applied to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for a license renewal, with the original license set to expire in March 2011. After a two-year review, the NRC granted a 20-year extension in January 2007, allowing operations until 2031.
However, in October 2018, then-owner Entergy Corp retired the facility early, shutting it down in May 2022 before selling it to Holtec. In September 2023, Holtec applied to the NRC for approval to restart operations, submitting a plan to bring the plant back online this year. At that point, Palisades still had nearly eight years left on its license.
The Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, by contrast, never applied for a license extension. It completed its 40-year operating period and was decommissioned as scheduled. Many of its components have reached the end of their service life and would need replacement — a fundamental difference from Palisades. Even if its license were still valid, restarting operations would still require approval from the Nuclear Safety Commission.
An NRC inspection report on Palisades last year found stress-corrosion cracking in 1,163 steam generator tubes — an issue that, if unaddressed, could pose a serious safety risk. Steam generators are critical components responsible for heat exchange in pressurized water reactors. Similar problems led to the early decommissioning of other facilities, such as the Crystal River Nuclear Plant in Florida and the San Onofre Plant in Southern California, both of which faced costly and problematic steam generator replacements. As of this year, the Palisades plant still has not received NRC approval to resume operations.
The Palisades plant’s license was legally extended, yet it shut down nearly halfway through its second operating term. The damage to its steam generators was uncovered by NRC inspections only after the closure.
In contrast, the Ma-anshan plant was decommissioned after completing its 40-year cycle and has never applied for a license extension.
Under standard procedures, expecting such an extension to be completed within two or three years is highly unrealistic. As seen in similar cases, the time and costs of maintenance could far exceed the optimistic estimates of pro-nuclear advocates — and could ultimately render an extension impossible.
Throughout its 40 years of operation, Ma-anshan supplied a substantial share of electricity to Taiwan’s economy, serving industrial, commercial and public needs — a contribution that merits recognition. Yet safety remains paramount. Any consideration of restarting Ma-anshan must grapple with the Hengchun Fault line nearby, a long-standing concern for local residents that directly bears on the feasibility of an extension.
The geological assessment alone would require considerable time. Moreover, if the refurbishment process revealed that more components needed replacement than initially anticipated, the likelihood of a swift extension would shrink even further.
To demand that the plant be quickly relicensed without first resolving these critical requirements is not only misguided — it is dangerously irresponsible.
Chen Kuan-lin is a research manager from Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The government and local industries breathed a sigh of relief after Shin Kong Life Insurance Co last week said it would relinquish surface rights for two plots in Taipei’s Beitou District (北投) to Nvidia Corp. The US chip-design giant’s plan to expand its local presence will be crucial for Taiwan to safeguard its core role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem and to advance the nation’s AI development. The land in dispute is owned by the Taipei City Government, which in 2021 sold the rights to develop and use the two plots of land, codenamed T17 and T18, to the
US President Donald Trump has announced his eagerness to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong-un while in South Korea for the APEC summit. That implies a possible revival of US-North Korea talks, frozen since 2019. While some would dismiss such a move as appeasement, renewed US engagement with North Korea could benefit Taiwan’s security interests. The long-standing stalemate between Washington and Pyongyang has allowed Beijing to entrench its dominance in the region, creating a myth that only China can “manage” Kim’s rogue nation. That dynamic has allowed Beijing to present itself as an indispensable power broker: extracting concessions from Washington, Seoul
Taiwan’s labor force participation rate among people aged 65 or older was only 9.9 percent for 2023 — far lower than in other advanced countries, Ministry of Labor data showed. The rate is 38.3 percent in South Korea, 25.7 percent in Japan and 31.5 percent in Singapore. On the surface, it might look good that more older adults in Taiwan can retire, but in reality, it reflects policies that make it difficult for elderly people to participate in the labor market. Most workplaces lack age-friendly environments, and few offer retraining programs or flexible job arrangements for employees older than 55. As
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
RSS