US President Donald Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, in a summit that could shape not only the trajectory of the war in Ukraine, but also the future of European security.
However, the much-anticipated meeting proved largely underwhelming, and international commentators were left with little to parse beyond the leaders’ body language and the symbolism of the venue. Trump hailed the summit as a “10 out of 10,” and the White House called it “historic,” but statements released afterward showed that three hours of talks had produced no tangible outcomes.
In the run-up to the meeting, many feared that Ukraine might be sacrificed in exchange for US-Russia deals on territorial concessions. Those concerns prompted the EU to convene a meeting before the summit, pledging its support for Kyiv and affirming that no territorial changes could be imposed without Ukraine’s consent.
In the end, none of the rumored breakthroughs materialized. The summit yielded neither a ceasefire nor even a partial deal, and offered no road map for negotiations. Nor did it broaden the agenda in the way some media reports had suggested.
Putin’s silence before the summit suggested that his priority was the face-to-face encounter itself. He had no expectation of tangible outcomes. Rather, his aim was to sideline the EU and Ukraine by engaging directly with Trump and casting himself as an indispensable interlocutor.
What lessons does this hold for Taiwan?
First, Putin used the summit to chip away at his diplomatic isolation through a one-on-one meeting with the US president. He might have dangled minor concessions, such as endorsing Trump’s view that Ukraine would not have been invaded under his leadership. By holding the talks in Alaska, a venue chosen to underscore the idea of the US and Russia as “good neighbors,” Putin sought to counter Europe’s “interference” in Ukraine.
In taking the gamble of traveling to US soil — even as a US B-2 stealth bomber and fighter jets roared overhead — Putin broke through his pariah status. The optics were unmistakable: the US president rolling out the red carpet for a leader wanted internationally on charges of war crimes.
Putin sought to project US-Russia relations as equal to, if not more important than, Washington’s ties with Ukraine and the EU. In his view, any ceasefire in the Ukraine war would hinge on Russia’s terms, not on US economic incentives.
Asked by reporters if he would stop killing civilians, Putin responded with a cold smile — a gesture that evoked the ongoing war without end and demonstrated the futility of expecting a tiger to surrender its skin.
Trump, for his part, said that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had assured him China would not invade Taiwan while he remained in office.
If true, Taiwan must use this window to strengthen its own resilience. The nation needs to convince its neighbors that any threat to Taiwan would not only disrupt global chip supply chains, but also endanger regional economic security and maritime transport.
When US policy appeared uncertain, Ukraine was buoyed by European allies who rejected any trade of territory for security, thereby giving Washington greater leverage in its talks with Moscow. A “temporary” ceasefire would only embolden the aggressor to demand more.
Similarly, Taiwan cannot rely solely on the US for protection. It must reinforce its own defenses while cultivating support from neighbors and allies such as Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Australia and New Zealand. Only then can Taiwan alleviate its concerns about US-China summits.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Italian Language and Culture and coordinator of the university’s diplomacy and international affairs program.
Translated by Fion Khan
The saga of Sarah Dzafce, the disgraced former Miss Finland, is far more significant than a mere beauty pageant controversy. It serves as a potent and painful contemporary lesson in global cultural ethics and the absolute necessity of racial respect. Her public career was instantly pulverized not by a lapse in judgement, but by a deliberate act of racial hostility, the flames of which swiftly encircled the globe. The offensive action was simple, yet profoundly provocative: a 15-second video in which Dzafce performed the infamous “slanted eyes” gesture — a crude, historically loaded caricature of East Asian features used in Western
Is a new foreign partner for Taiwan emerging in the Middle East? Last week, Taiwanese media reported that Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) secretly visited Israel, a country with whom Taiwan has long shared unofficial relations but which has approached those relations cautiously. In the wake of China’s implicit but clear support for Hamas and Iran in the wake of the October 2023 assault on Israel, Jerusalem’s calculus may be changing. Both small countries facing literal existential threats, Israel and Taiwan have much to gain from closer ties. In his recent op-ed for the Washington Post, President William
A stabbing attack inside and near two busy Taipei MRT stations on Friday evening shocked the nation and made headlines in many foreign and local news media, as such indiscriminate attacks are rare in Taiwan. Four people died, including the 27-year-old suspect, and 11 people sustained injuries. At Taipei Main Station, the suspect threw smoke grenades near two exits and fatally stabbed one person who tried to stop him. He later made his way to Eslite Spectrum Nanxi department store near Zhongshan MRT Station, where he threw more smoke grenades and fatally stabbed a person on a scooter by the roadside.
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
RSS