US President Donald Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, in a summit that could shape not only the trajectory of the war in Ukraine, but also the future of European security.
However, the much-anticipated meeting proved largely underwhelming, and international commentators were left with little to parse beyond the leaders’ body language and the symbolism of the venue. Trump hailed the summit as a “10 out of 10,” and the White House called it “historic,” but statements released afterward showed that three hours of talks had produced no tangible outcomes.
In the run-up to the meeting, many feared that Ukraine might be sacrificed in exchange for US-Russia deals on territorial concessions. Those concerns prompted the EU to convene a meeting before the summit, pledging its support for Kyiv and affirming that no territorial changes could be imposed without Ukraine’s consent.
In the end, none of the rumored breakthroughs materialized. The summit yielded neither a ceasefire nor even a partial deal, and offered no road map for negotiations. Nor did it broaden the agenda in the way some media reports had suggested.
Putin’s silence before the summit suggested that his priority was the face-to-face encounter itself. He had no expectation of tangible outcomes. Rather, his aim was to sideline the EU and Ukraine by engaging directly with Trump and casting himself as an indispensable interlocutor.
What lessons does this hold for Taiwan?
First, Putin used the summit to chip away at his diplomatic isolation through a one-on-one meeting with the US president. He might have dangled minor concessions, such as endorsing Trump’s view that Ukraine would not have been invaded under his leadership. By holding the talks in Alaska, a venue chosen to underscore the idea of the US and Russia as “good neighbors,” Putin sought to counter Europe’s “interference” in Ukraine.
In taking the gamble of traveling to US soil — even as a US B-2 stealth bomber and fighter jets roared overhead — Putin broke through his pariah status. The optics were unmistakable: the US president rolling out the red carpet for a leader wanted internationally on charges of war crimes.
Putin sought to project US-Russia relations as equal to, if not more important than, Washington’s ties with Ukraine and the EU. In his view, any ceasefire in the Ukraine war would hinge on Russia’s terms, not on US economic incentives.
Asked by reporters if he would stop killing civilians, Putin responded with a cold smile — a gesture that evoked the ongoing war without end and demonstrated the futility of expecting a tiger to surrender its skin.
Trump, for his part, said that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had assured him China would not invade Taiwan while he remained in office.
If true, Taiwan must use this window to strengthen its own resilience. The nation needs to convince its neighbors that any threat to Taiwan would not only disrupt global chip supply chains, but also endanger regional economic security and maritime transport.
When US policy appeared uncertain, Ukraine was buoyed by European allies who rejected any trade of territory for security, thereby giving Washington greater leverage in its talks with Moscow. A “temporary” ceasefire would only embolden the aggressor to demand more.
Similarly, Taiwan cannot rely solely on the US for protection. It must reinforce its own defenses while cultivating support from neighbors and allies such as Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Australia and New Zealand. Only then can Taiwan alleviate its concerns about US-China summits.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Italian Language and Culture and coordinator of the university’s diplomacy and international affairs program.
Translated by Fion Khan
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS