Sat, Aug 02, 2025 page7

• Shaolin Temple should take a vow of chastity, not poverty

  • By Shuli Ren / Bloomberg Opinion
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  As China’s fiscal conditions worsen, a scandal at the Shaolin Temple has ignited a debate over who owns the monastic institution’s cultural heritage and how to commercialize the world-famous brand.

  Authorities are investigating Shi Yongxin (釋永信), the long-time abbot of the monastery at the foot of a mountain peak in central China’s Henan Province, on suspicions of embezzlement, maintaining “improper relations” with women, and fathering at least one child. Companies linked to Shi, nicknamed the “CEO monk,” were deregistered and his Buddhist credentials revoked by the Buddhist Association of China, the national governing body for Buddhist affairs.

  Bloomberg News was unable to reach Shi. In a statement on Sunday, the temple confirmed that Shi was under investigation and said “relevant information will be disclosed to the public promptly.” Authorities have not concluded whether any inappropriate activity has taken place.

  This is not the first time Shi’s conduct has been questioned. In 2015, a whistle-blower accused Shi of similar misconduct, including maintaining mistresses and owning luxury cars. All charges were dropped in 2017. It is interesting that similar allegations are resurfacing.

  Shi is credited for turning around Shaolin financially. When he joined in 1981 as a 16-year-old, the monastery was in a dilapidated state, having just survived the Cultural Revolution. Now, Shaolin monks are far from impoverished. The temple has been transformed into a money-making machine, producing films, selling medicines and opening martial arts schools overseas.

  Over the years, the abbot had plenty of run-ins with local authorities over what he saw belonged to the monks. In 2009, he objected to a plan to list on the stock exchange assets in Songshan, the mountain range where the temple is located, because he did not want Shaolin to be bundled with other scenic spots. In 2014, the monastery sued the provincial government of Henan for breaching a revenue-sharing agreement over entrance ticket sales.

  “How much money can monks spend?” an official fumed.

  At the heart of the clashes is who gets to manage — and benefit — from the Shaolin brand, simultaneously spiritual and cool with the dual practices of Zen Buddhism and kung fu. In the early 1980s, Beijing allowed religious groups to self-fund through whatever means to upkeep their establishments and returned religious properties seized over previous decades.

  Religion, it turns out, is big business, and many want to share that uncommon prosperity.

  To some extent, Shi is a victim of his own success. He is a social media influencer. He is not shy about starting lawsuits. He has set up a labyrinth of corporate entities to monetize the Shaolin brand. He even dabbled in real estate development, spending US$71 million at a land auction in 2022. That prompted some netizens and newspaper editorials to argue that monks should not be so engaged with worldly affairs. Shi had argued for engagement in the secular world to preserve and spread Shaolin culture.

  What is wrong with having an earthly abbot? In modern corporate finance terms, Shi is a management monk, who takes the issue of money off the table so his colleagues could focus on more ethereal things, such as meditation and kung fu practice, which require focus and concentration. As to whether he ignored the celibacy required by Buddhism, public opinion could be forgiving. Traditional Chinese literature has plenty of well-liked monk characters who eat meat, drink wine and have sex.

  Ownership is becoming a hot topic in China. Two high-profile cases, the inheritance dispute at Hangzhou Wahaha Group, one of China’s largest beverage empires, and the Shaolin scandal, center around who should have control and say over billion-dollar brands.

  In the early 1980s, intent on opening up and reforming the economy, Beijing hurriedly passed regulations that gave private citizens and non-profit entities room to experiment and explore capitalism. Decades later, loopholes are starting to bubble up. Controversies around the world-famous Shaolin Temple would not end with the removal of its outspoken abbot.

  Shuli Ren is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian markets. A former investment banker, she was a markets reporter for Barron’s. She is a CFA charterholder. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Fertility rate falls to lowest globally

  • 2

    ’Up to Xi’ on Taiwan, but would be ’very unhappy’ with a change in ’status quo’: Trump

  • 3

    China widens attack on Japan’s ‘nuclear threat’

  • 4

    Marine Corps unit receives M4A1 rifles, source says

  • 5

    Interview: Trumpf expanding its Taiwan facilities