The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party on July 11 leveraged their legislative majority to pass the third reading of the Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social and National Security Resilience in Response to International Circumstances (因應國際情勢強化經濟社會及國土安全韌性特別條例). It included a universal NT$10,000 (US$334) cash handout, although the Executive Yuan did not include such a measure in the original budget. That contravenes Article 70 of the Constitution, which stipulates that the legislature cannot make proposals for expenditure increases in a budgetary bill presented by the Cabinet.
Local governments could distribute cash directly to residents, so long as they have approval from the county or city council. Kinmen County, for example, issued NT$6,000 in subsidies and stimulus vouchers to residents in 2021. Other counties, cities and even townships have implemented similar measures in the past without difficulty.
It ultimately comes down to two things — whether the local government has the funds, and whether local government leaders and council members are willing to distribute those funds.
This issue brings to mind how, on the eve of the recall vote on Saturday last week, Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) sent out a barrage of text messages urging voters to brave the wind and rain to vote against the recall, writing: “Lu Shiow-yen needs your help.” She also told citizens that if they did not vote, they would lose out on four things — the NT$10,000 cash handout, five extra national holidays for workers, the death penalty for cases of child abuse resulting in death and the rights and interests of military personnel, police and firefighters.
Lu had said that the central government should “return the money to the people,” and that it should be done “as soon as possible,” ideally in the form of direct cash payments.
After the recall vote, messages spread online that the Taichung City Government has a tax revenue surplus of NT$12 billion, prompting calls for a similar universal cash handout. Lu immediately denounced the reports as false and threatened to take legal action.
Her response gave rise to online ridicule, with some commenting that “she called for cash handouts before the recall vote, but now that it is over, she is calling for lawsuits.” Others questioned her behavior: “We do not even have free speech anymore. Has Taichung declared martial law?”
Since the KMT-led Taichung, Taipei and New Taipei City governments have excess tax revenue, should those not be distributed to residents? Is this not in line with the reasoning and spirit of the Legislative Yuan’s decision?
People commenting online were merely expressing a wish that aligns the KMT’s logic that surplus tax revenue should be “returned to the people.” They were asking Lu to lead by example and follow through on her own words — so why then, were they accused of spreading lies and threatened with lawsuits?
Taiwan has a saying to describe public servants who live off public resources and pocket the funds as their own, unwilling to part with a single cent. I sincerely hope that KMT leaders of local governments would be more generous toward their residents and — following the Legislative Yuan’s example — “return money to the people.”
After all, it is best to avoid double standards.
John Yu is a civil servant in Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS