British Secretary of State for Defence John Healey on Sunday said that the UK is ready to fight in the Pacific if necessary, making a clear signal of British alignment with allies in the region over a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan.
Healey made the remarks on board the Royal Navy’s HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier as it historically berthed at Australia’s Port of Darwin in preparation for joint military exercises. This year’s Talisman Sabre exercises would be the largest ever, attended by 35,000 military personnel from 19 countries, including the US, the UK, Australia and Japan.
Asked what the UK was doing to help Asian countries, such as Taiwan, prepare for a potential escalation from China, Healey said: “If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together. We exercise together, and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together.”
Although Healey reiterated that the UK would prefer that the dispute be solved peacefully and diplomatically, his comment has been one of the most robust from a British representative when it comes to the subject of possible engagement in a military conflict in the Indo-Pacific region.
While Washington and Beijing are engaged in heightened military competition, and intense tussles over trade talks and the Russia-Ukraine war — which has shown the uncertainty of US President Donald Trump’s administration’s stance on China — a growing number of European countries are increasing their presence in the Indo-Pacific region to express their opposition to China’s aggressive expansion.
Given the rising concerns over China’s perceived support for Russia’s war in Ukraine, and the imbalance in economic relations that are threatening Europe’s security, European countries are building their defense capacities and seeking more alliances in Asia to ensure the bloc’s interests in the international order, stability and security, and to protect freedom of navigation in the Indo-Pacific region, including in the Taiwan Strait, and the East and South China seas.
The Prince of Wales’ participation in the Talisman Sabre exercises marks a historic milestone and is the first time in nearly three decades that a British carrier strike group has operated in the region. The move is aligned with the British government’s Strategic Defense Review 2025 report, which addressed the importance of the Indo-Pacific region and marked China as a “persistent challenge.”
France in its National Strategic Assessment 2025 last month also highlighted the threats posed by China’s military coercion in the Taiwan Strait and in the Indo-Pacific region. The report came after French President Emmanuel Macron’s rare “strategic tour” to South Asian countries and participation in the Shangri-La Dialogue to showcase France as a viable alternative to the US and China.
The European Parliament and national parliaments have also established Taiwan friendship groups, and the EU in its Indo-Pacific Strategy report vowed to bolster cooperation with Asian partners, including Taiwan.
During the EU-China Summit in Beijing last month, EU leaders reiterated their opposition to any change in the Taiwan Strait and the Indo-Pacific region through force, and urged China to uphold the rules-based international order.
Healey said that “peace is secured through strength” and that partnerships are more important than ever amid growing threats in the Indo-Pacific region.
Taiwan should make efforts to develop more and closer strategic relations with like-minded European countries, not only to ensure peace and security in the Taiwan Strait and in Asia, but also to contribute to stability and prosperity in Europe and the global community.
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to