As the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens — with more than 38,000 Palestinians reported dead and the UN warning of “catastrophic hunger” — the US continues to provide Israel with weapons, diplomatic cover and near-unquestioned support.
For observers in Taiwan, this is not just a Middle East tragedy. It is a warning.
For decades, Taiwan has relied on the US for diplomatic backing, arms sales and international legitimacy in the face of Chinese pressure. That support has often been described as rooted in shared democratic values. Taiwan is portrayed as a responsible global actor and a like-minded ally in the Indo-Pacific region.
However, the Gaza war raises an uncomfortable question: What actually determines the US’ loyalty to its partners? Is it shared values and responsible behavior — or emotional narratives and domestic political alliances?
The US-Israel relationship has long been driven not just by strategy, but by cultural identification. Israel is viewed by many Americans as a biblical ally, a redemptive democracy and a symbol of moral purpose after the Holocaust. That emotional connection has made US policy toward Israel remarkably resilient — even when it comes at the expense of international law, humanitarian concerns or the US’ global reputation.
Taiwan should care because this pattern reveals that US support is not always based on conduct. It can be shaped by identity, history and domestic politics. Israel has become part of the US’ national story. Taiwan — despite being a democracy under constant pressure — is not.
If that is the reality, Taiwan should plan accordingly. We cannot take the US’ support for granted. A change in Washington’s political landscape, a rise in US isolationism or a shift in global priorities could easily leave Taiwan more vulnerable than many assume.
To be clear, this is not a call to abandon the Taiwan-US partnership. It is a call for clarity. Taiwan must understand what drives American decisionmaking, and invest in its own resilience, diplomacy and alliances — beyond slogans and sentiment.
The moral weight of “democracy versus authoritarianism” only works if the US applies it consistently.
Taiwan’s best defense lies in facts, not fantasies. We need continued US support — but it must be earned through strategy, deterrence and mutual interest, not romantic illusions.
The people of Gaza are suffering, but so is the US’ reputation. If Taiwan wants to avoid the same fate, we must learn the right lessons from today’s tragedy.
Simon Tang is an adjunct professor at California State University, Fullerton, who lectures on international relations.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS