As the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens — with more than 38,000 Palestinians reported dead and the UN warning of “catastrophic hunger” — the US continues to provide Israel with weapons, diplomatic cover and near-unquestioned support.
For observers in Taiwan, this is not just a Middle East tragedy. It is a warning.
For decades, Taiwan has relied on the US for diplomatic backing, arms sales and international legitimacy in the face of Chinese pressure. That support has often been described as rooted in shared democratic values. Taiwan is portrayed as a responsible global actor and a like-minded ally in the Indo-Pacific region.
However, the Gaza war raises an uncomfortable question: What actually determines the US’ loyalty to its partners? Is it shared values and responsible behavior — or emotional narratives and domestic political alliances?
The US-Israel relationship has long been driven not just by strategy, but by cultural identification. Israel is viewed by many Americans as a biblical ally, a redemptive democracy and a symbol of moral purpose after the Holocaust. That emotional connection has made US policy toward Israel remarkably resilient — even when it comes at the expense of international law, humanitarian concerns or the US’ global reputation.
Taiwan should care because this pattern reveals that US support is not always based on conduct. It can be shaped by identity, history and domestic politics. Israel has become part of the US’ national story. Taiwan — despite being a democracy under constant pressure — is not.
If that is the reality, Taiwan should plan accordingly. We cannot take the US’ support for granted. A change in Washington’s political landscape, a rise in US isolationism or a shift in global priorities could easily leave Taiwan more vulnerable than many assume.
To be clear, this is not a call to abandon the Taiwan-US partnership. It is a call for clarity. Taiwan must understand what drives American decisionmaking, and invest in its own resilience, diplomacy and alliances — beyond slogans and sentiment.
The moral weight of “democracy versus authoritarianism” only works if the US applies it consistently.
Taiwan’s best defense lies in facts, not fantasies. We need continued US support — but it must be earned through strategy, deterrence and mutual interest, not romantic illusions.
The people of Gaza are suffering, but so is the US’ reputation. If Taiwan wants to avoid the same fate, we must learn the right lessons from today’s tragedy.
Simon Tang is an adjunct professor at California State University, Fullerton, who lectures on international relations.
A 50-year-old on Wednesday last week died while under anesthesia at a Taipei cosmetic clinic shortly after undergoing a penis enlargement procedure. The surgeon was arrested for suspected medical malpractice, again bringing to the surface shortcomings in the regulation of cosmetic medicine. Media reports said the clinic owner and surgeon, surnamed Ting (丁), was previously convicted of negligent homicide for a postsurgical death and had been charged with coercion and aggravated assault after allegedly stopping a patient from calling for an ambulance. He had also been fined for failing inspections and had allegedly permitted people without medical licenses to assist
It was most annoying last week to read Chairman Xi Jinping’s (習近平) fulsome encomium to the People’s Liberation Army during the Eightieth Anniversary celebrations of victory over Japan in World War II. Comrade Xi’s soaring rhetoric was stuffed with “martyrs, sacrifice, solemnity and unwavering resolve” in praise of the “Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.” His aspirations overflowed with “world peace” and love of the United Nations, of which China is a founding member. The Liberation Army Daily said that every word from General Secretary Xi Jinping “resounded in his powerful voice, illuminating the
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
RSS