Is there famine in Gaza? The Israeli authority for the strip said no; the Hamas-run health ministry said about 10 people are dying of malnutrition every 24 hours.
Warring parties can rarely be taken at their word, and without access for independent journalists, little can be confirmed first hand. Even so, we know more than enough to act.
On Tuesday last week, 111 signatories from international aid organizations issued a statement warning that “mass starvation” was now spreading in Gaza. The previous day, 29 countries, including France and the UK, jointly condemned Israel’s “drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians.”
We know that the number of aid distribution points in Gaza has reduced to four — three in the south and one in the north — from about 400, as Israel seeks to control the flow. Israel also acknowledges that aid deliveries have plummeted since its new system took effect, with only the question of who to blame in dispute. However, the “who” and the “why” do not matter when it comes to the “what,” which is the impact this man-made hell is having.
It is evident that having so few aid points for 2 million people means that large numbers of civilians are forced to travel long distances in a war zone. They are being targeted en route.
Israel said Hamas is responsible, hoping to collapse a system that was created to prevent the group from seizing and selling aid to finance their war effort. Palestinians said Israeli Defense Force (IDF) snipers are doing the shooting, as part of a larger plan to make Gaza uninhabitable and force them out. The IDF acknowledges it has fired warning shots at crowds, but it is near impossible to prove what happened, because even victims might not see the sniper who shot them.
Again, who commits such monstrous acts is largely irrelevant to their impact on aid distribution and hunger. Clearly, Gaza’s civilian population is desperate enough to keep trying, despite the dangers involved.
British frontline charity UK-Med nurse Mandy Blackman said that one of the 30 people who passed through her field hospital after such an incident was a five-months-pregnant woman, shot in the abdomen while trying to get food. Another was a man beaten with bricks to rob him of the package he had just managed to collect.
UN officials said more than 1,000 people have now been killed trying to reach the distribution points run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which is backed by the US and Israel. These numbers also are hard to prove without independent media present, and now even the flow of information from local sources might be drying up. Agence France-Presse (AFP) last week issued a statement to say that their Gaza freelancers could no longer continue reporting news, because they were too weak for lack of food and water.
Meanwhile, Irish physiotherapist Rieke Hayes, who is working with the International Red Cross in Gaza, posted a blog on the International Committee of the Red Cross Web site describing the change in her work since she arrived in March. Back then, she was mainly treating shrapnel wounds.
Now, she it is bullets, she wrote, and the day-to-day numbers she cited were shocking.
“One morning, we had 179 dead and wounded brought to the field hospital. Another day, we had 50. Another day after that, 184 — 99 percent of whom had gunshot wounds. A few days later, we received over 240 patients within a few hours,” she wrote.
There are, of course, many other accounts, but these two struck me. The AFP notice, because this is an organization with a reputation for covering wars even when others do not. The agency has lost journalists to conflict, but it never before had to worry about losing one to starvation. And Hayes’ blog was striking, because it was so matter of fact. At no point does she claim to know who is doing the shooting or accuse anyone of anything. She just told what she saw.
Read down social media comment sections on such accounts, and you quickly find several ideas in common. For pro-Palestinians, there is a disgust that anyone is debating anything, because a genocide is underway. Pro-Israel accounts ask: “What about the hostages? Why not call on Hamas to release them and lay down their arms, instead of complaining about the IDF?” Or, “how can you cite Palestinians and international aid workers as evidence of anything? They are either Hamas terrorists themselves or Hamas sympathizers,” they write.
People do, of course, lie, especially in times of war and even to themselves. Polls showed that as many as 90 percent of Palestinians do not believe Hamas fighters were responsible for the atrocities committed on Oct. 7, 2023. Those denying hunger in Gaza or calling Israel’s escalation of the war justifiable self-defense are lying to themselves, too.
Hamas is a terrorist organization that has been using Palestinian civilians as pawns in a deadly game since day one. Israeli cabinet ministers are increasingly open about how they see Gaza’s future — annexed, run by Israeli security forces and resettled by Jewish Israelis.
Palestinians should “voluntarily” leave what the IDF is turning into a foodless, waterless wasteland, so that settlers could build US President Donald Trump’s beachfront paradise in peace, they say.
This, if allowed to succeed, must be called by its name, which is ethnic cleansing. However, right now the only priorities for US and Arab mediators should be to silence the guns in Gaza, get food and medical aid in, and bring the hostages out. Nothing else should be allowed to stand in the way.
Marc Champion is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe, Russia and the Middle East. He was previously Istanbul bureau chief for the Wall Street Journal.
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS