On July 19, Chou Chia-cheng (周佳正), a renowned breast surgeon from Taoyuan General Hospital, was fatally struck by a bus while crossing a road in Taipei. On Sunday last week, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) said that he was “deeply pained” by the incident and immediately directed the Taipei Transportation Bureau and Police Department to investigate and ensure accountability.
However, the mayor’s swift response — calling for crosswalk safety reviews, an investigation and accountability — was driven more by the victim’s high-profile status than by a commitment to sound governance. Among the key constituents of sound governance, fairness — particularly equal treatment — is noticeably lacking in the government’s response to pedestrian fatalities. Do high-ranking government officials in Taiwan typically comment on routine pedestrian fatalities involving ordinary citizens? The answer is no.
In response to the incident, the chairman of the bus company involved held a news conference, during which he bowed four times in apology and announced his resignation. Over the past five years, Taiwan has averaged about 420 pedestrian fatalities annually, with the majority caused by vehicle collisions rather than incidents like trips or falls.
Given the statistics, the bus company chairman’s unprecedented display of respect toward the deceased surgeon stands in stark contrast to the numerous pedestrian fatalities that occur annually.
The unusually deferential responses from the mayor and the chairman — reactions rarely seen in cases involving ordinary citizens — raise concerns that some lives might be valued more than others in Taiwan.
One might say that this case is different because the deceased person was a physician. Indeed, physicians — particularly surgeons — are often held in higher regard in Taiwan than in Western countries. This elevated status stems not only from their high incomes, but also from historical factors, such as the Japanese colonial period (1895-1945), when modern Western medical training and practices were introduced. During this time, physicians became symbols of modernization and progress, securing a high social standing in Taiwanese society.
However, when the historically inherited prestige of physicians begins to undermine democratic ideals by reinforcing social hierarchies or fostering unequal treatment, it becomes essential to reassess this heritage and redefine its role in a more equitable, modern society.
One example of this is ensuring that designated physicians — at approved conscription hospitals, whether military or civilian — provide accurate and impartial medical evaluations during the conscription process.
This type of fairness — spanning professions and civic duties — is crucial to maintaining democratic legitimacy. While democracy is founded on formal equality, real-world democracies often fall short of full egalitarianism due to economic disparities and occupational hierarchies. Despite these limitations, egalitarianism drives democracy forward by demanding not only formal rights, but also fair outcomes and equal access for all.
Egalitarianism and democracy can enhance military morale. Rand Corp studies of coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan found that troops’ morale was higher when they perceived equal treatment across ranks. Sociologist Morris Janowitz has said that soldiers in democracies often see themselves as defenders of freedom and national self-determination, giving their mission a deeper moral significance and fostering higher morale.
History provides a cautionary lesson about the dangers of weak egalitarianism, particularly within the military context. A historical example can be found in South Vietnam (1955-1975). While it held elections, the fragility of its democracy and deep social inequalities undermined military cohesion.
Low military morale played a significant role in South Vietnam’s defeat, partly driven by a corrupt draft system that allowed wealthy people to evade service, leaving primarily poor men to fight. Does this historical example resonate with Taiwan’s current situation? Recurring draft evasion scandals — such as the one featured in the CNN headline “A celebrity draft-dodging scandal lays bare problems with Taiwan’s crucial reservist force” on June 21 — raise questions about whether equality in Taiwan’s conscription system is consistently upheld.
Selective government responses based on a victim’s status raise serious concerns about the democratic integrity of a country. While elections might establish a formal democracy, genuine democratic substance requires equal protection and justice for all citizens. When justice is applied selectively to elites, democracy risks becoming hollow in substance, although full in form, sustaining morale built on appearances and slogans rather than genuine conviction in people’s hearts.
In an effort to mobilize national consensus amid internal divisions and China’s expanding threats, President William Lai (賴清德) recently launched campaigns such as “Unite Taiwan” and “Ten Talks on the Nation.” His unreserved, hands-on participation in the 41st Han Kuang exercises — the longest and most realistic ever conducted — went beyond ceremonial roles. Lai and his staff donned camouflage uniforms, bulletproof vests and helmets as part of a deliberate strategy to build morale.
However, the morale of contracted service members, conscripts and reservists cannot be built quickly or solely from the top down. Egalitarian, democratic governance remains the fundamental, underlying means to achieve this end.
Regan Chong is a Hong Konger advocating for Hong Kong’s independence from China and a contact person for the Hong Konger Front.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Owing to the combined majority of the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the legislature last week voted to further extend the current session to the end of next month, prolonging the session twice for a total of 211 days, the longest in Taiwan’s democratic history. Legally, the legislature holds two regular sessions annually: from February to May, and from September to December. The extensions pushed by the opposition in May and last week mean there would be no break between the first and second sessions this year. While the opposition parties said the extensions were needed to