The US House of Representatives on Friday last week passed the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal 2026, which includes US$500 million in aid for Taiwan.
The bill passed with overwhelming support, though one vocal opponent of the Taiwan provision was Republican US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. She argued that increasing foreign aid to Taiwan would deepen its reliance on the US — an unsustainable burden given the US$37 trillion national debt.
Republican US Representative Ken Calvert disagreed, noting that US President Donald Trump’s administration had just issued a policy statement the day before calling for even more aid for Taiwan, recommending US$1 billion.
Supporting Taiwan aligns with core US interests, Calvert said, adding that the funding would “go a long way to make sure that Taiwan has the resources necessary to help prevent a Chinese invasion.”
Democratic US Representative Betty McCollum echoed that sentiment, stating that “Taiwan is threatened by the People’s Republic of China” and warning that other nations, including the Philippines, could also be at risk “if Taiwan falls.”
The aid is deeply appreciated by Taiwan and would meaningfully enhance its defense preparedness. However, Greene’s concerns are not without merit.
Ukraine, for example, has received significant foreign aid, but has also made substantial progress in building defense self-sufficiency. One notable area of success is on the battlefield, where Ukraine has innovated by repurposing captured Russian weapons, modifying existing drones and developing new ones.
Taiwan, too, has invested heavily in building up its domestic defense capabilities — particularly missiles, submarines and naval corvettes.
Most recently, Taiwan test-fired its extended-range Hsiung Feng III missiles for the first time during the annual Han Kuang exercises. The Hai Kun (海鯤) — Taiwan’s first domestically developed defense submarine — began its sea acceptance trials last month. And in March, the Endeavor Manta, Taiwan’s first military-specification uncrewed surface vehicle (USV), was unveiled at Kaohsiung’s Singda Harbor.
Taiwan should engage Washington in discussions about channeling portions of US aid toward the development of its domestic defense industry. Doing so could mitigate delays in shipments of US-made systems by enabling Taiwan to develop alternatives at home. In the long term, this could position Taiwan as a defense supplier to regional allies such as the Philippines.
A Washington Post report on Monday last week said that the Philippines is seeking closer defense collaboration with Taiwan amid escalating Chinese threats. The two sides have conducted joint patrols of the Bashi Channel and Taiwan sent observers to a US-Philippines-Japan military exercise in the Batanes Islands. Taiwan could provide the Philippines with USVs, corvettes and submarines to help patrol the strategically vital Bashi Channel.
Such developments would not replace Taiwan’s procurement of US arms, but would complement them. In this year’s Han Kuang exercises, Taiwan tested a range of US-supplied systems, including M1A2T main battle tanks, High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, TOW-2B anti-tank missiles, land-based Harpoon anti-ship missiles and various uncrewed aerial vehicles. Taiwan is also expecting delivery of Lockheed Martin F-16C/D Block 70/72 jets.
The US remains an indispensable defense partner, offering essential training, support and advanced weapons systems, but as Greene pointed out, Taiwan cannot depend indefinitely on US funding for its defense — nor should it need to. With continued support from the US, Taiwan must persist in developing its domestic defense industry, bolstering self-reliance, while contributing proactively to regional peace and security.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS