The US House of Representatives on Friday last week passed the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal 2026, which includes US$500 million in aid for Taiwan.
The bill passed with overwhelming support, though one vocal opponent of the Taiwan provision was Republican US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. She argued that increasing foreign aid to Taiwan would deepen its reliance on the US — an unsustainable burden given the US$37 trillion national debt.
Republican US Representative Ken Calvert disagreed, noting that US President Donald Trump’s administration had just issued a policy statement the day before calling for even more aid for Taiwan, recommending US$1 billion.
Supporting Taiwan aligns with core US interests, Calvert said, adding that the funding would “go a long way to make sure that Taiwan has the resources necessary to help prevent a Chinese invasion.”
Democratic US Representative Betty McCollum echoed that sentiment, stating that “Taiwan is threatened by the People’s Republic of China” and warning that other nations, including the Philippines, could also be at risk “if Taiwan falls.”
The aid is deeply appreciated by Taiwan and would meaningfully enhance its defense preparedness. However, Greene’s concerns are not without merit.
Ukraine, for example, has received significant foreign aid, but has also made substantial progress in building defense self-sufficiency. One notable area of success is on the battlefield, where Ukraine has innovated by repurposing captured Russian weapons, modifying existing drones and developing new ones.
Taiwan, too, has invested heavily in building up its domestic defense capabilities — particularly missiles, submarines and naval corvettes.
Most recently, Taiwan test-fired its extended-range Hsiung Feng III missiles for the first time during the annual Han Kuang exercises. The Hai Kun (海鯤) — Taiwan’s first domestically developed defense submarine — began its sea acceptance trials last month. And in March, the Endeavor Manta, Taiwan’s first military-specification uncrewed surface vehicle (USV), was unveiled at Kaohsiung’s Singda Harbor.
Taiwan should engage Washington in discussions about channeling portions of US aid toward the development of its domestic defense industry. Doing so could mitigate delays in shipments of US-made systems by enabling Taiwan to develop alternatives at home. In the long term, this could position Taiwan as a defense supplier to regional allies such as the Philippines.
A Washington Post report on Monday last week said that the Philippines is seeking closer defense collaboration with Taiwan amid escalating Chinese threats. The two sides have conducted joint patrols of the Bashi Channel and Taiwan sent observers to a US-Philippines-Japan military exercise in the Batanes Islands. Taiwan could provide the Philippines with USVs, corvettes and submarines to help patrol the strategically vital Bashi Channel.
Such developments would not replace Taiwan’s procurement of US arms, but would complement them. In this year’s Han Kuang exercises, Taiwan tested a range of US-supplied systems, including M1A2T main battle tanks, High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, TOW-2B anti-tank missiles, land-based Harpoon anti-ship missiles and various uncrewed aerial vehicles. Taiwan is also expecting delivery of Lockheed Martin F-16C/D Block 70/72 jets.
The US remains an indispensable defense partner, offering essential training, support and advanced weapons systems, but as Greene pointed out, Taiwan cannot depend indefinitely on US funding for its defense — nor should it need to. With continued support from the US, Taiwan must persist in developing its domestic defense industry, bolstering self-reliance, while contributing proactively to regional peace and security.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Saturday is the day of the first batch of recall votes primarily targeting lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The scale of the recall drive far outstrips the expectations from when the idea was mooted in January by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘). The mass recall effort is reminiscent of the Sunflower movement protests against the then-KMT government’s non-transparent attempts to push through a controversial cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014. That movement, initiated by students, civic groups and non-governmental organizations, included student-led protesters occupying the main legislative chamber for three weeks. The two movements are linked
RSS