“Mr Japan” finally has his trade deal, after three months of talks. It looks like it will be his final act.
After a third successive blow from the Japanese electorate, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba blinked in trade talks with the US. He spent months seeking a complete removal of the levies that US President Donald Trump held over the country, including those already imposed on cars.
“We will never accept tariffs, especially on autos,” Ishiba said in May, declaring the issue his red line.
Illustration: Mountain People
With vehicles long the main source of Trump’s ire — perhaps understandably, given that they account for more than three-quarters of the trade deficit — getting the president to back down was always going to be a tough ask, especially considering Japan’s lack of leverage.
However, after Sunday’s hammering in the upper house election, which has left the prime minister with a minority in both houses of parliament and arguably the worst electoral record of any Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) leader in history, Ishiba has seemingly accepted his fate. That is why he agreed to the deal that would include 15 percent tariffs across the board, including on cars.
With this last piece of business concluded, local media indicated that less than one year into his term, Ishiba would soon announce his resignation. The prime minister has subsequently denied the reports, which were made by multiple independent outlets.
Trade envoy and close aide Ryosei Akazawa painted a positive picture. It was “mission completed” in the tariff talks, he cheerfully wrote on social media, pointing to a picture hung in the White House of Ishiba and Trump speaking at the G7 meeting in Canada. He also denied any link between the agreement and the election results.
Certainly, markets were pleased, with automakers surging after being freed from months of uncertainty. Toyota Motor Corp rose by the most in nearly 40 years; the TOPIX headed for an all-time high.
Perhaps it is as good a deal as Japan could expect. As with all these agreements, the devil is in the details: It still puts a 15 percent levy across the board on imports. While that is less than the 25 percent tariff that was threatened, and most importantly less than the 25 percent already imposed on auto imports in May, it would still be damaging for exporters. There is an odd promise of US$550 billion in investment in the US, and a more logical agreement for Japan to buy more US rice. The part about Japan opening “to trade including cars and trucks” is confusing, given that there are no barriers currently in place.
However, perhaps Ishiba has done what he should have in the beginning, and simply told Trump what he wants to hear — knowing it would not, indeed cannot, be delivered.
The agreement also removes the last piece of leverage the prime minister had left — the “national crisis” he said must be prioritized ahead of infighting. That has been enough to keep the target off his back, until now. After Sunday’s results, it is clear he cannot be allowed to do any more harm.
In just 10 months, his weak leadership has resulted in an unstable political landscape that threatens to damage Japan for years. Conservative voters have deserted the LDP in droves — and headed to some disturbingly populist places. The landscape is so fractured that there is also not a viable opposition to take over, meaning the forecast is for parliamentary gridlock.
That is why the LDP needs to win voters back. With the trade deal about to be done, Ishiba should leave as soon as possible. Many conservatives are eyeing the anniversary of the end of World War II next month, fearing he would further alienate right-leaning voters by undoing the groundbreaking statement by late former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe on the 70th anniversary a decade ago.
It is not Ishiba’s fault that relations with the US have been so tarnished. That blame lies with Trump. By removing the uncertainty around tariffs, he would finally have done some good for the country, but he would leave Japan in a weaker position than when he took office — and in search of direction once again.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia, and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has