The oil market is deceptively calm. Below the apparent tranquility lies an underappreciated transformation that has slowly reshaped the market over the past 25 years — because the arrival of China and India as big consumers has not just given an enormous boost to demand, it has also altered the market’s seasonality, which matters a lot this year.
Until recently, global oil demand peaked every year with the arrival of the Northern Hemisphere’s winter. As temperatures dropped from October onward, heating oil and kerosene consumption spiked from the US to Germany to Japan. Hence, as recently as 2014, the fourth quarter still marked the annual high for crude demand and, typically, prices. Since then, the seasonality has flipped: Now, the third quarter sees higher demand and prices.
The shift means the market is now at its tightest from July to September, rather than October to December. While one-time events can still have an effect — such as the 2008 global financial crisis or the COVID-19 pandemic that started in early 2020 — looking over a long enough timescale reveals the change clearly, because it happened incrementally over one-quarter of a century, it often does not get the attention it deserves.
The change has three notable features. First, consumption of winter fuels including heating oil and kerosene is on a structural decline in the industrialized world, replaced by natural gas and electricity. Back in 1990, about 17 percent of American families heated their homes by burning some kind of refined petroleum product; today, that share has fallen to 9 percent.
The collapse in demand for heating oil in Europe is even more pronounced. At the same time, jet fuel consumption in those regions, which typically peaks during the summer holidays, is growing fast.
Second, oil demand in fast-growing emerging nations follows different seasonal patterns, partly because of their locations closer to the equator, but also because of the larger role of their all-year-round industrial oil consumption. While industrialized nations mostly abandoned oil-fired power stations after the 1970s energy crisis, some emerging market countries, particularly in the Middle East, burn lots of crude for electricity generation and water desalination.
At the peak in the summer of last year, Saudi Arabia burned more than 800,000 barrels a day to generate electricity for air conditioning — more than the daily total petroleum demand of Belgium.
Third, climate change is reducing heating consumption by making winters warmer, and boosting holiday travel by making summers hotter. So this year, global third-quarter oil demand would be 500,000 barrels a day higher than fourth-quarter consumption. In a dataset going back to 1991, the current year will mark only the fifth time when winter demand will be lower than summer consumption.
Despite rising production from the OPEC+ cartel, oil prices have stabilized in recent weeks at just more than US$65 a barrel — about US$10 above the lows seen in early May. If anything, the physical oil market even feels a bit tight. It helps that China has mopped up much of the oil surplus, putting in May and June barrels into its expanding strategic and commercial stockpiles.
However, the squeeze would prove temporary; put another way, the market is defying gravity. Due to shifting seasonality, the Northern Hemisphere’s summer is now the tightest period of the year. Winter — and an accompanying decrease in demand — is coming.
For now, the few remaining oil bulls have a few straws of hope to cling to. Global crude refinery intake is rising swiftly this month and looks set to peak next month at a record 85.4 million barrels a day — enough to absorb the series of OPEC output increases. As a result, global oil stocks are not increasing meaningfully near where it matters most to the market: the pricing points in northwestern Europe, home of the Brent benchmark, and the central area of the US, home to the West Texas Intermediate yardstick.
However, by October, when all of the cartel’s supply hikes would have arrived, along with extra oil from Brazil, Guyana and Canada, refinery throughput would drop to 81.7 million barrels a day, according to the International Energy Agency.
The difference — 3.7 million barrels a day — is equal to a couple of mid-sized OPEC nations. Even if China continues stockpiling as much as it has done over the past two months, the surplus would be so large that oil would flow into inventories elsewhere, including near the pricing points on both sides of the Atlantic.
For sure, the market might be wrong about demand, supply or both. The expected oil surplus during the now seasonally weaker fourth quarter might be smaller than anticipated. Still, on paper, the glut is so big that even if it turns out to be a bit smaller, it would still be enough to put a lot of downward pressure on the market.
As I said, winter is coming for the oil market.
Javier Blas is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy and commodities. He is coauthor of The World for Sale: Money, Power and the Traders Who Barter the Earth’s Resources. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS